H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Pascale Paradis Mangon H2H: 3-1

Betsy Nagelsen holds a 3–1 lead over Pascale Paradis Mangon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Betsy Nagelsen leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1990 Albuquerque round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen

USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H

3 – 1

4 main-draw meetings

Pascale Paradis Mangon

FRA Age 60 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Betsy Nagelsen #67	6-3 6-4	Pascale Paradis Mangon	Match data	Aug 9, 1990*	R32	Albuquerque	Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250	Hard
Betsy Nagelsen #66	5-7 6-4 6-4	Pascale Paradis Mangon	Match data	Aug 27, 1987*	R32	Mahwah	WTA 250	Hard
Betsy Nagelsen #45	6-1 6-0	Pascale Paradis Mangon	Match data	Apr 18, 1987*	R16	Tokyo Japan Open	WTA 250	Hard
Pascale Paradis Mangon	6-4 6-7 7-6	Betsy Nagelsen #77	Match data	Jan 6, 1985*	R16	Ginny Championships	WTA 250	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Betsy Nagelsen	#692	#25	28	1,890	266	324	45.1%	0	0	0	0	6	6
Pascale Paradis Mangon	—	—	—	1,817	139	157	47.0%	0	0	0	0	1	1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Betsy Nagelsen							Pascale Paradis Mangon
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	0–1	0.0%	—	1,484	0	0
15	1972	4–2	66.7%	—	1,511	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1973	1–3	25.0%	—	1,494	0	1	1982	0–1	0.0%	—	1,476	0	0
17	1974	27–18	60.0%	—	1,724	0	3	1983	8–6	57.1%	—	1,597	0	1
18	1975	18–17	51.4%	—	1,790	0	3	1984	25–21	54.3%	—	1,794	0	1
19	1976	11–19	36.7%	—	1,709	0	3	1985	18–20	47.4%	—	1,732	0	1
20	1977	8–15	34.8%	—	1,678	0	3	1986	5–16	23.8%	—	1,591	0	1
21	1978	13–24	35.1%	—	1,659	0	3	1987	7–14	33.3%	—	1,572	0	1
22	1979	18–19	48.6%	—	1,694	0	5	1988	19–12	61.3%	—	1,758	0	1
23	1980	22–27	44.9%	—	1,753	0	5	1989	4–10	28.6%	—	1,678	0	1
24	1981	20–21	48.8%	—	1,806	0	6	1990	3–9	25.0%	—	1,591	0	1
25	1982	12–17	41.4%	—	1,705	0	6	1991	13–14	48.1%	—	1,629	0	1
26	1983	18–22	45.0%	—	1,692	0	6	1992	21–17	55.3%	—	1,728	0	1
27	1984	11–18	37.9%	#77	1,630	0	6	1993	16–16	50.0%	—	1,675	0	1
28	1985	14–12	53.8%	#81	1,713	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	18–17	51.4%	#46	1,699	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	13–15	46.4%	#61	1,645	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1988	11–19	36.7%	#109	1,585	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1989	18–15	54.5%	#45	1,662	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	8–12	40.0%	#96	1,639	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	0–2	0.0%	#337	1,607	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	1–5	16.7%	#418	1,561	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	0–4	0.0%	#394	1,510	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	0–1	0.0%	#692	1,509	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Betsy Nagelsen																	Pascale Paradis Mangon
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
15	1972	—	—	—	—	2	1	3	66.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1973	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1982	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1974	3	2	5	60.0%	6	6	12	50.0%	13	6	19	68.4%	0	4	4	0.0%	1983	3	1	4	75.0%	3	1	4	75.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
18	1975	5	5	10	50.0%	6	5	11	54.5%	2	3	5	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1984	7	7	14	50.0%	2	4	6	33.3%	8	4	12	66.7%	8	6	14	57.1%
19	1976	0	2	2	0.0%	5	11	16	31.3%	3	3	6	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	1985	5	7	12	41.7%	3	5	8	37.5%	8	5	13	61.5%	2	3	5	40.0%
20	1977	3	3	6	50.0%	1	4	5	20.0%	3	5	8	37.5%	1	3	4	25.0%	1986	4	4	8	50.0%	0	4	4	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	6	7	14.3%
21	1978	3	7	10	30.0%	4	6	10	40.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	1	6	7	14.3%	1987	5	8	13	38.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	2	3	5	40.0%
22	1979	4	7	11	36.4%	0	2	2	0.0%	4	4	8	50.0%	2	6	8	25.0%	1988	8	4	12	66.7%	0	4	4	0.0%	11	4	15	73.3%	—	—	—	—
23	1980	7	7	14	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	10	7	17	58.8%	5	11	16	31.3%	1989	4	7	11	36.4%	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
24	1981	5	6	11	45.5%	1	4	5	20.0%	11	4	15	73.3%	3	7	10	30.0%	1990	1	4	5	20.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	2	4	50.0%
25	1982	2	4	6	33.3%	2	3	5	40.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	5	7	12	41.7%	1991	4	5	9	44.4%	0	1	1	0.0%	2	3	5	40.0%	7	5	12	58.3%
26	1983	2	7	9	22.2%	2	5	7	28.6%	4	5	9	44.4%	7	4	11	63.6%	1992	7	8	15	46.7%	1	2	3	33.3%	1	2	3	33.3%	12	5	17	70.6%
27	1984	9	7	16	56.3%	0	4	4	0.0%	2	7	9	22.2%	—	—	—	—	1993	4	7	11	36.4%	4	2	6	66.7%	2	2	4	50.0%	6	5	11	54.5%
28	1985	6	5	11	54.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	6	10	16	37.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	7	3	10	70.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	8	6	14	57.1%	—	—	—	—	5	5	10	50.0%	0	4	4	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1988	5	13	18	27.8%	—	—	—	—	4	5	9	44.4%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1989	12	10	22	54.5%	—	—	—	—	6	3	9	66.7%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	3	7	10	30.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	84	114	198	42.4%	29	59	88	33.0%	95	80	175	54.3%	35	67	102	34.3%	—	52	62	114	45.6%	13	28	41	31.7%	34	30	64	53.1%	40	37	77	51.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Betsy Nagelsen																Pascale Paradis Mangon
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
14	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1980	1484	97.6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-2.33	0–1	—	—	+0.15
15	1972	1511	98.7	—	—	—	—	—	+28	—	53.8%	+0.23	2–1 (67%)	1–1	—	+0.77	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1973	1495	98.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	-1.00	0–2	1–0	—	+0.55	1982	1477	102.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	0.00	0–1	0–1	—	-0.05
17	1974	1725	133.0	—	—	—	—	-176	-202	+77	57.7%	+0.46	8–6 (57%)	5–6 (45%)	103.4	+0.58	1983	1597	124.8	—	—	—	—	+35	+6	+16	54.5%	+0.45	3–2 (60%)	1–0	—	+1.06
18	1975	1791	125.1	—	—	—	—	-124	-166	-38	45.7%	-0.44	4–4 (50%)	3–3 (50%)	101.5	-3.05	1984	1795	139.8	—	—	—	—	-61	-201	-20	51.4%	+0.27	11–8 (58%)	5–8 (38%)	103.8	+0.80
19	1976	1709	124.2	—	—	—	—	-65	-116	+70	41.4%	-0.76	3–7 (30%)	1–1	—	-1.73	1985	1732	131.9	—	—	—	—	-46	-134	+44	46.3%	-0.15	11–8 (58%)	7–9 (44%)	101.1	-1.06
20	1977	1678	123.8	—	—	—	—	-30	-105	+46	37.9%	-0.62	6–6 (50%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.05	1986	1591	109.2	—	—	—	—	+14	-69	—	35.2%	-0.81	3–9 (25%)	2–5 (29%)	89.5	+0.75
21	1978	1659	129.6	—	—	—	—	-99	-85	+99	40.7%	-0.58	4–10 (29%)	3–7 (30%)	92.4	-0.84	1987	1573	113.1	—	—	—	—	+26	—	—	37.0%	-1.02	1–3 (25%)	1–3 (25%)	95.5	+0.50
22	1979	1695	122.8	—	—	—	—	-132	—	+12	48.9%	+0.08	8–8 (50%)	1–3 (25%)	98.5	+1.65	1988	1758	137.3	—	—	—	—	-51	-334	+78	58.9%	+0.55	6–5 (55%)	0–1	—	+0.75
23	1980	1753	130.7	—	—	—	—	-148	—	+40	47.9%	-0.41	7–12 (37%)	6–2 (75%)	102.2	-1.78	1989	1678	123.2	—	—	—	—	-19	—	—	33.3%	-0.97	2–3 (40%)	1–2 (33%)	—	-1.02
24	1981	1806	134.9	—	—	—	—	-129	-305	+99	49.5%	-0.18	8–7 (53%)	5–5 (50%)	103.7	-3.53	1990	1591	108.4	—	—	—	—	+8	—	—	32.3%	-1.03	3–4 (43%)	1–2 (33%)	97.2	+0.11
25	1982	1705	123.2	—	—	—	—	-99	-214	+170	47.3%	-0.34	5–11 (31%)	9–3 (75%)	100.0	-0.40	1991	1629	128.1	—	—	—	—	+15	—	+138	50.8%	+0.27	3–4 (43%)	0–1	—	+0.74
26	1983	1693	126.7	—	—	—	—	-32	-138	+114	46.3%	-0.46	7–8 (47%)	7–6 (54%)	102.2	+0.98	1992	1729	133.8	—	—	—	—	+18	-308	+21	54.5%	+0.28	6–6 (50%)	2–2 (50%)	99.3	+1.14
27	1984	1631	126.4	—	—	—	—	+59	-141	+117	41.4%	-0.51	5–7 (42%)	7–3 (70%)	99.2	+0.69	1993	1675	130.6	—	—	—	—	-11	-173	+93	50.7%	+0.32	5–6 (45%)	2–1 (67%)	99.4	+0.13
28	1985	1714	129.5	—	—	—	—	-26	—	+87	54.2%	+0.36	7–4 (64%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+1.17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	1699	131.1	—	—	—	—	-55	—	+171	51.8%	+0.01	6–7 (46%)	4–3 (57%)	98.8	+1.66	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	1646	121.6	—	—	—	—	-24	—	+148	46.2%	0.00	5–6 (45%)	4–5 (44%)	97.1	+1.69	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1988	1586	116.1	—	—	—	—	-27	—	+128	42.5%	-0.27	4–9 (31%)	5–8 (38%)	93.3	+1.55	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1989	1662	126.0	—	—	—	—	-56	—	+96	50.6%	+0.04	11–6 (65%)	3–4 (43%)	105.8	+1.48	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	1640	115.0	—	—	—	—	-81	—	+173	40.0%	-0.60	3–2 (60%)	2–4 (33%)	100.0	+0.09	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	1608	97.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	20.0%	-2.40	0–1	—	—	-0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	1561	105.4	—	—	—	—	-52	—	—	26.7%	-1.67	1–2 (33%)	1–0	—	+0.03	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	1511	98.5	—	—	—	—	-47	—	—	20.0%	-2.70	0–2	0–1	—	+0.17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	1509	102.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.50	—	—	—	-0.16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1891	131.9	—	—	—	—	-73	-148	+94	46.5%	-0.28	104–128 (45%)	70–69 (50%)	101.1	+0.27	—	1818	135.4	—	—	—	—	-9	-167	+47	47.9%	-0.04	54–60 (47%)	22–35 (39%)	92.9	+1.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Betsy Nagelsen's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Pam Shriver	1	9	10	Nov 12, 1992	H2H
Sue Barker	2	8	10	Jun 28, 1981	H2H
Mary Lou Piatek	1	8	9	Sep 26, 1986	H2H
Rosie Casals	3	6	9	Aug 29, 1985	H2H
Virginia Wade	1	8	9	Jun 15, 1983	H2H

Pascale Paradis Mangon's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Raffaella Reggi Concato	4	4	8	Feb 10, 1991	H2H
Helena Sukova	2	5	7	Jun 16, 1988	H2H
Manuela Maleeva Fragniere	1	4	5	Feb 27, 1993	H2H
Sylvia Hanika	1	4	5	Mar 6, 1986	H2H
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy	1	3	4	Aug 26, 1993	H2H