H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Patty Fendick H2H: 1-2

Patty Fendick holds a 2–1 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Patty Fendick leads 2–0 on carpet, while Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patty Fendick won the 1992 Oakland third round 6-7 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 5, 1992* Oakland WTA 250 R32 Carpet Patty Fendick #49 6-7 6-1 6-1 Betsy Nagelsen #455 Match data
Apr 23, 1988* Taipei WTA 250 QF Carpet Patty Fendick #25 6-4 7-6 Betsy Nagelsen #108 Match data
Aug 6, 1987* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Betsy Nagelsen #68 6-2 7-6 Patty Fendick #86 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,551 0 0
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,740 0 3
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,690 0 3
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,779 0 3
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,725 0 3
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,691 0 3
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —