H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Betsy Nagelsen vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 1-2
Regina Marsikova holds a 2–1 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Regina Marsikova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1981 Richmond quarterfinal 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 69
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 67
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1981* | Richmond | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Betsy Nagelsen | 6-3 7-5 | Regina Marsikova | Match data |
| Sep 12, 1980* | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Regina Marsikova | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Betsy Nagelsen | Match data |
| May 27, 1978* | Rome | WTA 1000 | QF | Clay | Regina Marsikova | 6-4 6-2 | Betsy Nagelsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betsy Nagelsen | #692 | #25 | 28 | 1,885 | 266 | 324 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Regina Marsikova | — | — | — | 2,044 | 266 | 198 | 57.3% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Betsy Nagelsen | Regina Marsikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1972 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 1 | 1975 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1974 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1975 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 37–17 | 68.5% | — | 1,906 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1976 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 56–30 | 65.1% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 12 |
| 20 | 1977 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 38–24 | 61.3% | — | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 21 | 1978 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 33–22 | 60.0% | — | 1,937 | 0 | 14 |
| 22 | 1979 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,695 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 2,005 | 0 | 15 |
| 23 | 1980 | 22–27 | 44.9% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1981 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,803 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1982 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1983 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,767 | 0 | 15 |
| 27 | 1984 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #77 | 1,630 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 15–19 | 44.1% | — | 1,722 | 0 | 15 |
| 28 | 1985 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #81 | 1,714 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 15 |
| 29 | 1986 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 15 |
| 30 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #61 | 1,645 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,541 | 0 | 15 |
| 31 | 1988 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,663 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,640 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #337 | 1,608 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #418 | 1,561 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1993 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #394 | 1,512 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,510 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |