H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Regina Marsikova H2H: 1-2

Regina Marsikova holds a 2–1 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Regina Marsikova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1981 Richmond quarterfinal 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Regina Marsikova
CZE Age 67

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Betsy Nagelsen 6-3 7-5 Regina Marsikova Match data Aug 15, 1981* QF Richmond WTA 250 Hard
Regina Marsikova 3-6 6-3 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen Match data Sep 12, 1980* R16 Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 Hard
Regina Marsikova 6-4 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen Match data May 27, 1978* QF Italian Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,890 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Regina Marsikova — — — 2,034 266 198 57.3% 0 0 0 2 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Regina Marsikova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1 1974 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1 1975 5–5 50.0% — 1,581 0 0
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3 1976 17–15 53.1% — 1,748 0 1
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3 1977 37–17 68.5% — 1,909 0 8
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1978 56–30 65.1% — 1,953 0 12
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,678 0 3 1979 38–24 61.3% — 1,937 0 12
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1980 33–22 60.0% — 1,899 0 14
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5 1981 34–16 68.0% — 1,996 0 15
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,753 0 5 — — — — — — —
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,806 0 6 — — — — — — —
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,705 0 6 — — — — — — —
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1985 12–16 42.9% — 1,763 0 15
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1986 15–19 44.1% — 1,719 0 15
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,713 0 6 1987 14–19 42.4% — 1,672 0 15
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 1988 4–7 36.4% — 1,605 0 15
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 1989 1–6 14.3% — 1,540 0 15
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,585 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6 — — — — — — —
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,639 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,607 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,509 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Regina Marsikova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
16 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1976 — — — — 15 7 22 68.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3%
18 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 25 5 30 83.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1978 17 10 27 63.0% 21 4 25 84.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 11 16 31.3%
20 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1979 12 7 19 63.2% 17 7 24 70.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
21 1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1980 15 7 22 68.2% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
22 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1981 8 4 12 66.7% 25 9 34 73.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 1985 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 1986 7 8 15 46.7% 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 8 10 18 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
31 1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3% — 65 49 114 57.0% 144 74 218 66.1% 32 28 60 53.3% 24 46 70 34.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Regina Marsikova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77 1974 1500 116.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.30
16 1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.55 1975 1582 125.6 — — — — +75 +3 — 50.0% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 2–0 — +0.09
17 1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.58 1976 1748 142.4 — — — — -178 +62 -176 51.3% +0.34 7–7 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 97.4 -1.38
18 1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.05 1977 1909 143.6 — — — — -347 +113 -243 62.5% +0.85 14–6 (70%) 5–4 (56%) 108.8 +1.24
19 1976 1709 124.2 — — — — -65 -116 +70 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.73 1978 1953 157.8 — — — — -98 +117 -133 64.0% +0.95 12–9 (57%) 8–6 (57%) 108.5 -6.24
20 1977 1678 123.8 — — — — -30 -105 +46 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 1979 1937 147.6 — — — — -80 +154 -90 60.4% +0.53 11–8 (58%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 -2.91
21 1978 1659 129.6 — — — — -99 -85 +99 40.7% -0.58 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 92.4 -0.84 1980 1899 147.5 — — — — -23 +194 — 56.1% +0.38 8–6 (57%) 6–4 (60%) 100.5 -6.21
22 1979 1695 122.8 — — — — -132 — +12 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.65 1981 1997 159.3 — — — — -116 +182 — 63.3% +0.90 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 103.0 -6.03
23 1980 1753 130.7 — — — — -148 — +40 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1981 1806 134.9 — — — — -129 -305 +99 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1982 1705 123.2 — — — — -99 -214 +170 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1983 1693 126.7 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.98 1985 1764 131.5 — — — — +4 +295 -77 49.2% -0.07 0–5 (0%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -2.30
27 1984 1631 126.4 — — — — +59 -141 +117 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.69 1986 1720 126.9 — — — — +1 +191 — 41.8% -0.58 8–3 (73%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 -2.11
28 1985 1714 129.5 — — — — -26 — +87 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.17 1987 1672 129.0 — — — — +36 +92 -19 46.1% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 4–5 (44%) 95.0 -2.58
29 1986 1699 131.1 — — — — -55 — +171 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.66 1988 1606 99.5 — — — — — +87 — 33.3% -2.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.61
30 1987 1646 121.6 — — — — -24 — +148 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.69 1989 1541 97.0 — — — — — +71 — 14.3% -2.21 — 0–1 — +0.28
31 1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -27 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1989 1662 126.0 — — — — -56 — +96 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1990 1640 115.0 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -52 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1891 131.9 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–128 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.1 +0.27 — 2034 150.4 — — — — -68 +139 -140 55.7% +0.35 80–57 (58%) 50–42 (54%) 107.3 -6.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.