H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 1-4

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 4–1 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 2–1 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1990 Birmingham round of 16 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main-draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rosalyn Fairbank #20 6-3 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen #63 Match data Jun 15, 1990* R16 Birmingham Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass
Rosalyn Fairbank #37 6-3 6-0 Betsy Nagelsen #63 Match data Jun 24, 1989* QF Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Rosalyn Fairbank #40 6-4 4-6 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen #124 Match data Sep 15, 1988* R32 Phoenix WTA 250 Hard
Rosalyn Fairbank #47 7-5 5-7 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen #75 Match data Oct 5, 1984* R16 Manhattan Beach WTA 250 Hard
Betsy Nagelsen 6-2 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data Jun 19, 1980* R32 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,890 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,932 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,539 0 0
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,723 0 0
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,677 0 0
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,678 0 3 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,656 0 0
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,897 0 0
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,918 0 1
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,753 0 5 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,766 0 1
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,806 0 6 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,705 0 6 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,755 0 1
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,772 0 1
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,713 0 6 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,845 0 1
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,787 0 1
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,585 0 6 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,726 0 1
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,639 0 6 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,607 0 6 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,598 0 1
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,509 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Rosalyn Fairbank
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1978 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
18 1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — —
19 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1980 3 6 9 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8%
21 1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 8 13 38.5%
22 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 4 12 66.7%
23 1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3% 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 7 11 36.4%
24 1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 1985 13 11 24 54.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1986 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0%
26 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6% 1987 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
27 1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — 1988 11 11 22 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0%
28 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1989 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 3 8 62.5%
29 1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1990 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5%
30 1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1991 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
32 1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 9 11 20 45.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
34 1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
35 1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3% — 109 110 219 49.8% 44 51 95 46.3% 128 76 204 62.7% 51 70 121 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Rosalyn Fairbank
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.58 1978 1539 104.5 — — — — — — +66 75.0% +0.75 — 2–0 — +0.38
18 1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.05 1979 1724 136.7 — — — — — -159 -3 61.3% +1.02 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.5 +0.70
19 1976 1709 124.2 — — — — -65 -116 +70 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.73 1980 1678 128.5 — — — — -83 -36 +37 52.1% +0.08 6–8 (43%) 1–0 — -0.49
20 1977 1678 123.8 — — — — -30 -105 +46 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 1981 1657 122.8 — — — — -41 +16 +48 40.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.67
21 1978 1659 129.6 — — — — -99 -85 +99 40.7% -0.58 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 92.4 -0.84 1982 1897 150.2 — — — — -180 -228 +28 57.5% +0.52 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 105.2 -2.75
22 1979 1695 122.8 — — — — -132 — +12 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.65 1983 1919 136.6 — — — — -79 -271 +29 53.1% +0.19 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) 101.2 -2.11
23 1980 1753 130.7 — — — — -148 — +40 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -1.78 1984 1767 136.1 — — — — +21 -164 +101 46.8% +0.05 7–8 (47%) 3–8 (27%) 94.2 +0.03
24 1981 1806 134.9 — — — — -129 -305 +99 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.53 1985 1806 136.7 — — — — -14 -143 +37 51.3% +0.09 9–4 (69%) 9–2 (82%) 109.3 -1.60
25 1982 1705 123.2 — — — — -99 -214 +170 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 -0.40 1986 1824 142.9 — — — — +15 -154 -17 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 5–4 (56%) 102.0 -2.16
26 1983 1693 126.7 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.98 1987 1756 134.7 — — — — -60 -105 +159 50.0% +0.03 8–6 (57%) 5–1 (83%) 103.9 -0.46
27 1984 1631 126.4 — — — — +59 -141 +117 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.69 1988 1772 141.1 — — — — -53 -160 +181 56.0% +0.38 7–11 (39%) 8–5 (62%) 98.3 +0.48
28 1985 1714 129.5 — — — — -26 — +87 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.17 1989 1845 147.2 — — — — -106 -205 +177 57.8% +0.54 7–5 (58%) 6–8 (43%) 101.7 -0.49
29 1986 1699 131.1 — — — — -55 — +171 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.66 1990 1787 137.3 — — — — -6 — +236 51.9% +0.13 11–3 (79%) 5–2 (71%) 108.9 +0.60
30 1987 1646 121.6 — — — — -24 — +148 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.69 1991 1637 127.7 — — — — +34 -74 +316 46.1% -0.10 3–7 (30%) 1–5 (17%) 88.8 +1.07
31 1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -27 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.55 1992 1726 133.0 — — — — -39 -176 +270 51.5% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.5 -1.50
32 1989 1662 126.0 — — — — -56 — +96 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.48 1993 1766 146.5 — — — — -14 -176 +196 45.3% -0.44 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -2.22
33 1990 1640 115.0 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09 1994 1704 104.2 — — — — -15 — — 0.0% -3.63 — — — -0.30
34 1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01 1995 1599 97.0 — — — — +23 — +239 15.8% -2.47 0–1 — — +0.12
35 1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -52 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1891 131.9 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–128 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.1 +0.27 — 1932 143.7 — — — — -36 -134 +112 51.1% +0.09 105–87 (55%) 65–57 (53%) 105.0 -1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.