H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Rosalyn Fairbank H2H: 1-4

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 4–1 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 2–1 on grass and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1990 Birmingham fourth round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 15, 1990* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Rosalyn Fairbank #20 6-3 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen #63 Match data
Jun 24, 1989* Eastbourne WTA 250 QF Grass Rosalyn Fairbank #37 6-3 6-0 Betsy Nagelsen #63 Match data
Sep 15, 1988* Phoenix WTA 250 R32 Hard Rosalyn Fairbank #40 6-4 4-6 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen #124 Match data
Oct 5, 1984* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Rosalyn Fairbank #47 7-5 5-7 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen #75 Match data
Jun 19, 1980* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Betsy Nagelsen 6-2 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Rosalyn Fairbank
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —