Betsy Nagelsen
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Shriver | 1 | 9 | 10 | Nov 12, 1992 | H2H |
| Sue Barker | 2 | 8 | 10 | Jun 28, 1981 | H2H |
| Mary Lou Piatek | 1 | 8 | 9 | Sep 26, 1986 | H2H |
| Rosie Casals | 3 | 6 | 9 | Aug 29, 1985 | H2H |
| Virginia Wade | 1 | 8 | 9 | Jun 15, 1983 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC
Betsy Nagelsen vs S Worsford H2H: 1-0
Betsy Nagelsen holds a 1–0 lead over S Worsford in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1974 Newport Wales round of 32 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betsy Nagelsen | 6-1 6-0 | S Worsford | Match data | Jul 11, 1974* | R32 | Newport Wales | WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betsy Nagelsen | — | #25 | 28 | 1,892 | 266 | 324 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| S Worsford | — | — | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Betsy Nagelsen | S Worsford | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1972 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 1 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 22–27 | 44.9% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #77 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #61 | 1,646 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,662 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,640 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #418 | 1,561 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Betsy Nagelsen | S Worsford | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1972 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1974 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1973 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 84 | 114 | 198 | 42.4% | 29 | 59 | 88 | 33.0% | 95 | 80 | 175 | 54.3% | 35 | 67 | 102 | 34.3% | Career | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Betsy Nagelsen | S Worsford | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1972 | 1511 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | 53.8% | +0.23 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.77 | 1974 | 1489 | 92.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.01 |
| 1973 | 1495 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.54 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1974 | 1725 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | -176 | -202 | +77 | 57.7% | +0.46 | 8–6 (57%) | 5–6 (45%) | 103.4 | +0.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1975 | 1791 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | -124 | -166 | -38 | 45.7% | -0.44 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.5 | -3.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1976 | 1708 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | -64 | -115 | +73 | 41.4% | -0.76 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–1 | — | -1.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 1678 | 124.1 | — | — | — | — | -30 | -106 | +48 | 37.9% | -0.62 | 6–6 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 1658 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | -102 | -84 | +101 | 41.2% | -0.57 | 4–11 (27%) | 3–7 (30%) | 91.9 | -1.33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 1695 | 123.1 | — | — | — | — | -131 | — | +13 | 48.9% | +0.08 | 8–8 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.5 | +1.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 1756 | 131.7 | — | — | — | — | -144 | — | +38 | 47.9% | -0.41 | 7–12 (37%) | 6–2 (75%) | 102.2 | -2.08 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 1809 | 135.3 | — | — | — | — | -128 | -307 | +95 | 49.5% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 5–5 (50%) | 103.7 | -3.62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 1706 | 123.4 | — | — | — | — | -98 | -215 | +169 | 47.3% | -0.34 | 5–11 (31%) | 9–3 (75%) | 100.0 | +0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 1693 | 127.0 | — | — | — | — | -32 | -138 | +114 | 46.3% | -0.46 | 7–8 (47%) | 7–6 (54%) | 102.2 | +0.86 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 1632 | 126.6 | — | — | — | — | +58 | -142 | +116 | 41.4% | -0.51 | 5–7 (42%) | 7–3 (70%) | 99.2 | +0.78 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1714 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | -25 | — | +88 | 54.2% | +0.36 | 7–4 (64%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 1700 | 131.2 | — | — | — | — | -55 | — | +170 | 51.8% | +0.01 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.8 | +1.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 1646 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | -24 | — | +150 | 46.2% | 0.00 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–5 (44%) | 97.1 | +1.59 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 1586 | 116.1 | — | — | — | — | -26 | — | +128 | 42.5% | -0.27 | 4–9 (31%) | 5–8 (38%) | 93.3 | +1.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 1663 | 126.1 | — | — | — | — | -56 | — | +97 | 50.6% | +0.04 | 11–6 (65%) | 3–4 (43%) | 105.8 | +1.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 1640 | 115.1 | — | — | — | — | -81 | — | +173 | 40.0% | -0.60 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.0 | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 1608 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.40 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 1561 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | -50 | — | — | 26.7% | -1.67 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 1511 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | -47 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.70 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1509 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1893 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | -73 | -148 | +94 | 46.5% | -0.28 | 104–129 (45%) | 70–69 (50%) | 101.0 | +0.16 | Career | 1500 | 95.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -1.00 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
S Worsford
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betsy Nagelsen | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jul 11, 1974 | H2H |