H2H data updated: 2026-09-10 00:00 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Sherry Acker H2H: 2-0

Betsy Nagelsen holds a 2–0 lead over Sherry Acker in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1981 Tokyo Sillook round of 32 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen

USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H

2 – 0

2 main-draw meetings

Sherry Acker

USA Age 67 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Betsy Nagelsen	6-3 6-1	Sherry Acker	Match data	Sep 17, 1981*	R32	Tokyo Sillook	WTA 250	Carpet
Betsy Nagelsen	6-4 7-6	Sherry Acker	Match data	Jun 10, 1981*	R64	Surbiton	WTA 250	Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Betsy Nagelsen	#692	#25	28	1,890	266	324	45.1%	0	0	0	0	6	6
Sherry Acker	—	—	—	1,838	63	100	38.7%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Betsy Nagelsen							Sherry Acker
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
15	1972	4–2	66.7%	—	1,511	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1973	1–3	25.0%	—	1,494	0	1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1974	27–18	60.0%	—	1,724	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1975	18–17	51.4%	—	1,790	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1976	11–19	36.7%	—	1,709	0	3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1977	8–15	34.8%	—	1,678	0	3	1979	13–21	38.2%	—	1,591	0	0
21	1978	13–24	35.1%	—	1,659	0	3	1980	29–31	48.3%	—	1,827	0	0
22	1979	18–19	48.6%	—	1,694	0	5	1981	8–19	29.6%	—	1,679	0	0
23	1980	22–27	44.9%	—	1,753	0	5	1982	1–5	16.7%	—	1,629	0	0
24	1981	20–21	48.8%	—	1,806	0	6	1983	11–15	42.3%	—	1,618	0	0
25	1982	12–17	41.4%	—	1,705	0	6	1984	1–9	10.0%	—	1,523	0	0
26	1983	18–22	45.0%	—	1,692	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1984	11–18	37.9%	#77	1,630	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1985	14–12	53.8%	#81	1,713	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	18–17	51.4%	#46	1,699	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	13–15	46.4%	#61	1,645	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1988	11–19	36.7%	#109	1,585	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1989	18–15	54.5%	#45	1,662	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	8–12	40.0%	#96	1,639	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	0–2	0.0%	#337	1,607	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	1–5	16.7%	#418	1,561	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	0–4	0.0%	#394	1,510	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	0–1	0.0%	#692	1,509	0	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Betsy Nagelsen																	Sherry Acker
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
15	1972	—	—	—	—	2	1	3	66.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1973	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1974	3	2	5	60.0%	6	6	12	50.0%	13	6	19	68.4%	0	4	4	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1975	5	5	10	50.0%	6	5	11	54.5%	2	3	5	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1976	0	2	2	0.0%	5	11	16	31.3%	3	3	6	50.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1977	3	3	6	50.0%	1	4	5	20.0%	3	5	8	37.5%	1	3	4	25.0%	1979	7	6	13	53.8%	3	5	8	37.5%	1	6	7	14.3%	2	4	6	33.3%
21	1978	3	7	10	30.0%	4	6	10	40.0%	5	5	10	50.0%	1	6	7	14.3%	1980	5	6	11	45.5%	3	4	7	42.9%	4	3	7	57.1%	17	18	35	48.6%
22	1979	4	7	11	36.4%	0	2	2	0.0%	4	4	8	50.0%	2	6	8	25.0%	1981	4	5	9	44.4%	1	2	3	33.3%	2	6	8	25.0%	1	6	7	14.3%
23	1980	7	7	14	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	10	7	17	58.8%	5	11	16	31.3%	1982	0	1	1	0.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%	0	1	1	0.0%
24	1981	5	6	11	45.5%	1	4	5	20.0%	11	4	15	73.3%	3	7	10	30.0%	1983	4	6	10	40.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	6	6	12	50.0%	1	2	3	33.3%
25	1982	2	4	6	33.3%	2	3	5	40.0%	3	3	6	50.0%	5	7	12	41.7%	1984	0	5	5	0.0%	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	1	2	3	33.3%
26	1983	2	7	9	22.2%	2	5	7	28.6%	4	5	9	44.4%	7	4	11	63.6%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1984	9	7	16	56.3%	0	4	4	0.0%	2	7	9	22.2%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1985	6	5	11	54.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	7	5	12	58.3%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	6	10	16	37.5%	0	1	1	0.0%	7	3	10	70.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	8	6	14	57.1%	—	—	—	—	5	5	10	50.0%	0	4	4	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1988	5	13	18	27.8%	—	—	—	—	4	5	9	44.4%	2	1	3	66.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1989	12	10	22	54.5%	—	—	—	—	6	3	9	66.7%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	3	7	10	30.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	5	3	8	62.5%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	84	114	198	42.4%	29	59	88	33.0%	95	80	175	54.3%	35	67	102	34.3%	—	20	29	49	40.8%	7	13	20	35.0%	14	25	39	35.9%	22	33	55	40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Betsy Nagelsen																Sherry Acker
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
15	1972	1511	98.7	—	—	—	—	—	+28	—	53.8%	+0.23	2–1 (67%)	1–1	—	+0.77	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
16	1973	1495	98.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	-1.00	0–2	1–0	—	+0.55	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1974	1725	133.0	—	—	—	—	-176	-202	+77	57.7%	+0.46	8–6 (57%)	5–6 (45%)	103.4	+0.58	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1975	1791	125.1	—	—	—	—	-124	-166	-38	45.7%	-0.44	4–4 (50%)	3–3 (50%)	101.5	-3.05	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1976	1709	124.2	—	—	—	—	-65	-116	+70	41.4%	-0.76	3–7 (30%)	1–1	—	-1.73	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
20	1977	1678	123.8	—	—	—	—	-30	-105	+46	37.9%	-0.62	6–6 (50%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.05	1979	1591	125.4	—	—	—	—	+78	-54	-62	40.0%	-0.87	2–4 (33%)	2–3 (40%)	98.5	+2.65
21	1978	1659	129.6	—	—	—	—	-99	-85	+99	40.7%	-0.58	4–10 (29%)	3–7 (30%)	92.4	-0.84	1980	1827	146.8	—	—	—	—	+12	-281	-229	47.8%	-0.02	10–8 (56%)	6–6 (50%)	106.3	-1.45
22	1979	1695	122.8	—	—	—	—	-132	—	+12	48.9%	+0.08	8–8 (50%)	1–3 (25%)	98.5	+1.65	1981	1680	125.6	—	—	—	—	+54	-92	-121	33.3%	-0.87	2–5 (29%)	2–5 (29%)	94.0	-2.47
23	1980	1753	130.7	—	—	—	—	-148	—	+40	47.9%	-0.41	7–12 (37%)	6–2 (75%)	102.2	-1.78	1982	1630	123.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	-41	33.3%	-0.87	0–3 (0%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.22
24	1981	1806	134.9	—	—	—	—	-129	-305	+99	49.5%	-0.18	8–7 (53%)	5–5 (50%)	103.7	-3.53	1983	1619	119.0	—	—	—	—	+4	—	+38	39.3%	-0.70	4–2 (67%)	3–4 (43%)	102.8	+0.10
25	1982	1705	123.2	—	—	—	—	-99	-214	+170	47.3%	-0.34	5–11 (31%)	9–3 (75%)	100.0	-0.40	1984	1523	98.5	—	—	—	—	-7	—	—	24.0%	-1.40	1–4 (20%)	1–3 (25%)	95.3	+0.67
26	1983	1693	126.7	—	—	—	—	-32	-138	+114	46.3%	-0.46	7–8 (47%)	7–6 (54%)	102.2	+0.98	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
27	1984	1631	126.4	—	—	—	—	+59	-141	+117	41.4%	-0.51	5–7 (42%)	7–3 (70%)	99.2	+0.69	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
28	1985	1714	129.5	—	—	—	—	-26	—	+87	54.2%	+0.36	7–4 (64%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+1.17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	1986	1699	131.1	—	—	—	—	-55	—	+171	51.8%	+0.01	6–7 (46%)	4–3 (57%)	98.8	+1.66	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
30	1987	1646	121.6	—	—	—	—	-24	—	+148	46.2%	0.00	5–6 (45%)	4–5 (44%)	97.1	+1.69	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
31	1988	1586	116.1	—	—	—	—	-27	—	+128	42.5%	-0.27	4–9 (31%)	5–8 (38%)	93.3	+1.55	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
32	1989	1662	126.0	—	—	—	—	-56	—	+96	50.6%	+0.04	11–6 (65%)	3–4 (43%)	105.8	+1.48	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
33	1990	1640	115.0	—	—	—	—	-81	—	+173	40.0%	-0.60	3–2 (60%)	2–4 (33%)	100.0	+0.09	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
34	1991	1608	97.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	20.0%	-2.40	0–1	—	—	-0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
35	1992	1561	105.4	—	—	—	—	-52	—	—	26.7%	-1.67	1–2 (33%)	1–0	—	+0.03	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
36	1993	1511	98.5	—	—	—	—	-47	—	—	20.0%	-2.70	0–2	0–1	—	+0.17	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
37	1994	1509	102.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.50	—	—	—	-0.16	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
Career	—	1891	131.9	—	—	—	—	-73	-148	+94	46.5%	-0.28	104–128 (45%)	70–69 (50%)	101.1	+0.27	—	1839	135.3	—	—	—	—	+28	-149	-72	40.4%	-0.56	19–26 (42%)	15–23 (39%)	97.2	-0.17

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Betsy Nagelsen's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Pam Shriver	1	9	10	Nov 12, 1992	H2H
Sue Barker	2	8	10	Jun 28, 1981	H2H
Mary Lou Piatek	1	8	9	Sep 26, 1986	H2H
Rosie Casals	3	6	9	Aug 29, 1985	H2H
Virginia Wade	1	8	9	Jun 15, 1983	H2H

Sherry Acker's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Virginia Wade	0	5	5	Oct 8, 1981	H2H
Betty Ann Grubb	1	4	5	Sep 3, 1981	H2H
Mary Lou Piatek	0	4	4	Sep 1, 1983	H2H
Martina Navratilova	0	4	4	Jun 24, 1983	H2H
Barbara Potter	3	1	4	Nov 19, 1981	H2H