H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Susan Sloane Lundy H2H: 1-0

Betsy Nagelsen holds a 1–0 lead over Susan Sloane Lundy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Betsy Nagelsen leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1988 Taipei round of 16 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Susan Sloane Lundy
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Betsy Nagelsen #108 6-4 6-2 Susan Sloane Lundy Match data Apr 22, 1988* R16 Taipei WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,890 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Susan Sloane Lundy — — — 1,882 96 94 50.5% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Betsy Nagelsen Susan Sloane Lundy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,511 0 1 1985 0–1 0.0% — 1,485 0 0
1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,494 0 1 1986 9–12 42.9% — 1,595 0 0
1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,724 0 3 1987 10–14 41.7% — 1,635 0 0
1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,790 0 3 1988 23–14 62.2% — 1,845 0 1
1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1989 20–15 57.1% — 1,755 0 1
1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,678 0 3 1990 22–16 57.9% — 1,781 0 1
1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1991 11–15 42.3% — 1,652 0 1
1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,694 0 5 1992 1–7 12.5% — 1,579 0 1
1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,753 0 5 — — — — — — —
1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,806 0 6 — — — — — — —
1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,705 0 6 — — — — — — —
1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 — — — — — — —
1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 — — — — — — —
1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,713 0 6 — — — — — — —
1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 — — — — — — —
1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 — — — — — — —
1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,585 0 6 — — — — — — —
1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,662 0 6 — — — — — — —
1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,639 0 6 — — — — — — —
1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,607 0 6 — — — — — — —
1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —
1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,509 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Betsy Nagelsen Susan Sloane Lundy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1972 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1973 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1974 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
1975 5 5 10 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1988 16 9 25 64.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
1976 0 2 2 0.0% 5 11 16 31.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1989 11 10 21 52.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
1977 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 16 9 25 64.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1978 3 7 10 30.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1991 11 11 22 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
1979 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 1992 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 5 11 16 31.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 5 6 11 45.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 9 7 16 56.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1986 6 10 16 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1987 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1988 5 13 18 27.8% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1989 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1990 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1991 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1993 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 84 114 198 42.4% 29 59 88 33.0% 95 80 175 54.3% 35 67 102 34.3% Career 66 62 128 51.6% 21 22 43 48.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Betsy Nagelsen Susan Sloane Lundy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1972 1511 98.7 — — — — — +28 — 53.8% +0.23 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.77 1985 1485 95.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — +0.22
1973 1495 98.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.55 1986 1596 132.9 — — — — +16 -38 — 43.5% -0.37 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.3 -0.48
1974 1725 133.0 — — — — -176 -202 +77 57.7% +0.46 8–6 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 103.4 +0.58 1987 1636 123.6 — — — — 0 -71 — 39.3% -0.80 6–2 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.9 -1.68
1975 1791 125.1 — — — — -124 -166 -38 45.7% -0.44 4–4 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 101.5 -3.05 1988 1846 136.9 — — — — -23 -203 — 53.0% +0.20 11–2 (85%) 3–1 (75%) 113.8 -0.25
1976 1709 124.2 — — — — -65 -116 +70 41.4% -0.76 3–7 (30%) 1–1 — -1.73 1989 1755 137.6 — — — — -4 -18 — 57.9% +0.67 2–4 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 94.8 -0.26
1977 1678 123.8 — — — — -30 -105 +46 37.9% -0.62 6–6 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 1990 1782 135.7 — — — — +21 -73 — 56.5% +0.31 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 99.8 -0.62
1978 1659 129.6 — — — — -99 -85 +99 40.7% -0.58 4–10 (29%) 3–7 (30%) 92.4 -0.84 1991 1653 118.9 — — — — +54 -8 — 46.3% -0.46 1–5 (17%) — — +0.61
1979 1695 122.8 — — — — -132 — +12 48.9% +0.08 8–8 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.5 +1.65 1992 1580 105.6 — — — — +35 — — 12.5% -2.63 — — — -0.33
1980 1753 130.7 — — — — -148 — +40 47.9% -0.41 7–12 (37%) 6–2 (75%) 102.2 -1.78 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 1806 134.9 — — — — -129 -305 +99 49.5% -0.18 8–7 (53%) 5–5 (50%) 103.7 -3.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 1705 123.2 — — — — -99 -214 +170 47.3% -0.34 5–11 (31%) 9–3 (75%) 100.0 -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 1693 126.7 — — — — -32 -138 +114 46.3% -0.46 7–8 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 102.2 +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 1631 126.4 — — — — +59 -141 +117 41.4% -0.51 5–7 (42%) 7–3 (70%) 99.2 +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 1714 129.5 — — — — -26 — +87 54.2% +0.36 7–4 (64%) 1–2 (33%) — +1.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1986 1699 131.1 — — — — -55 — +171 51.8% +0.01 6–7 (46%) 4–3 (57%) 98.8 +1.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1987 1646 121.6 — — — — -24 — +148 46.2% 0.00 5–6 (45%) 4–5 (44%) 97.1 +1.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1988 1586 116.1 — — — — -27 — +128 42.5% -0.27 4–9 (31%) 5–8 (38%) 93.3 +1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1989 1662 126.0 — — — — -56 — +96 50.6% +0.04 11–6 (65%) 3–4 (43%) 105.8 +1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1990 1640 115.0 — — — — -81 — +173 40.0% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 2–4 (33%) 100.0 +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1991 1608 97.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1992 1561 105.4 — — — — -52 — — 26.7% -1.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1993 1511 98.5 — — — — -47 — — 20.0% -2.70 0–2 0–1 — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1994 1509 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1891 131.9 — — — — -73 -148 +94 46.5% -0.28 104–128 (45%) 70–69 (50%) 101.1 +0.27 Career 1882 136.6 — — — — +11 -67 — 49.0% -0.10 27–19 (59%) 13–16 (45%) 103.8 -1.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.