Betsy Nagelsen
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Shriver | 1 | 9 | 10 | Nov 12, 1992 | H2H |
| Sue Barker | 2 | 8 | 10 | Jun 28, 1981 | H2H |
| Mary Lou Piatek | 1 | 8 | 9 | Sep 26, 1986 | H2H |
| Rosie Casals | 3 | 6 | 9 | Aug 29, 1985 | H2H |
| Virginia Wade | 1 | 8 | 9 | Jun 15, 1983 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC
Sylvia Hanika holds a 4–1 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Sylvia Hanika leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Sylvia Hanika won the 1987 Mahwah round of 16 6-0 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvia Hanika | 6-0 6-2 | Betsy Nagelsen | Match data | Aug 28, 1987* | R16 | Mahwah | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Sylvia Hanika | 6-1 6-4 | Betsy Nagelsen | Match data | Aug 15, 1984* | R64 | Mahwah | WTA 250 | Hard |
| Sylvia Hanika | 6-3 6-3 | Betsy Nagelsen | Match data | Feb 1, 1980* | R16 | Seattle | WTA 250 | Carpet |
| Sylvia Hanika | 1-6 6-3 6-2 | Betsy Nagelsen | Match data | Aug 30, 1979* | R128 | US Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
| Betsy Nagelsen | 6-4 7-5 | Sylvia Hanika | Match data | Jun 1, 1978* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betsy Nagelsen | — | #25 | 28 | 1,892 | 266 | 324 | 45.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Sylvia Hanika | — | #5 | 48 | 2,137 | 415 | 239 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 9 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Betsy Nagelsen | Sylvia Hanika | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1972 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1973 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | 1976 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1974 | 27–18 | 60.0% | — | 1,724 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1975 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,817 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1976 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 26–16 | 61.9% | — | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 1977 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,677 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 2,003 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1978 | 13–24 | 35.1% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 61–23 | 72.6% | #6 | 2,085 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1979 | 18–19 | 48.6% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #10 | 1,946 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1980 | 22–27 | 44.9% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #5 | 1,970 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 1981 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,808 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #17 | 1,880 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1982 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,706 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,868 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1983 | 18–22 | 45.0% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 6 | 1986 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 1984 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #77 | 1,631 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,919 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | 1985 | 14–12 | 53.8% | — | 1,714 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #17 | 1,919 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 1986 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #46 | 1,699 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #41 | 1,806 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #61 | 1,646 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #123 | 1,702 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1988 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #109 | 1,586 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #45 | 1,662 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1990 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,640 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1991 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1992 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #418 | 1,561 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1993 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,509 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Betsy Nagelsen | Sylvia Hanika | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | 1972 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1973 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 17 | 1974 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1977 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 18 | 1975 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1978 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 10 | 5 | 15 | 66.7% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% |
| 19 | 1976 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1979 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 11 | 5 | 16 | 68.8% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 20 | 1977 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1980 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% |
| 21 | 1978 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1981 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 19 | 5 | 24 | 79.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 26 | 10 | 36 | 72.2% |
| 22 | 1979 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1982 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 25 | 10 | 35 | 71.4% |
| 23 | 1980 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 1983 | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 28 | 12 | 40 | 70.0% |
| 24 | 1981 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1984 | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 25 | 1982 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 1985 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
| 26 | 1983 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 1986 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% |
| 27 | 1984 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 11 | 4 | 15 | 73.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% |
| 28 | 1985 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1988 | 16 | 8 | 24 | 66.7% | 20 | 8 | 28 | 71.4% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% |
| 29 | 1986 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 1989 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 30 | 1987 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1990 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 31 | 1988 | 5 | 13 | 18 | 27.8% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1989 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1990 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1992 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1993 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1994 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 84 | 114 | 198 | 42.4% | 29 | 59 | 88 | 33.0% | 95 | 80 | 175 | 54.3% | 35 | 67 | 102 | 34.3% | — | 99 | 60 | 159 | 62.3% | 129 | 64 | 193 | 66.8% | 38 | 32 | 70 | 54.3% | 144 | 80 | 224 | 64.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Betsy Nagelsen | Sylvia Hanika | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | 1972 | 1511 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | 53.8% | +0.23 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1973 | 1495 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 40.0% | -1.00 | 0–2 | 1–0 | — | +0.54 | 1976 | 1533 | 101.8 | — | — | — | — | +88 | — | — | 66.7% | +0.50 | — | 1–1 | — | +0.64 |
| 17 | 1974 | 1725 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | -176 | -202 | +77 | 57.7% | +0.46 | 8–6 (57%) | 5–6 (45%) | 103.4 | +0.49 | 1977 | 1584 | 118.4 | — | — | — | — | +75 | -25 | — | 55.6% | +1.28 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | +1.84 |
| 18 | 1975 | 1791 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | -124 | -166 | -38 | 45.7% | -0.44 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.5 | -3.24 | 1978 | 1817 | 145.6 | — | — | — | — | -62 | -183 | -96 | 62.6% | +1.14 | 6–3 (67%) | 4–2 (67%) | 105.8 | +0.65 |
| 19 | 1976 | 1708 | 124.4 | — | — | — | — | -64 | -115 | +73 | 41.4% | -0.76 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–1 | — | -1.59 | 1979 | 1951 | 158.3 | — | — | — | — | -90 | -104 | -188 | 57.9% | +0.65 | 8–5 (62%) | 4–5 (44%) | 106.6 | -2.46 |
| 20 | 1977 | 1678 | 124.1 | — | — | — | — | -30 | -106 | +48 | 37.9% | -0.62 | 6–6 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.11 | 1980 | 2003 | 159.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -68 | -218 | 61.3% | +0.93 | 11–4 (73%) | 4–5 (44%) | 105.0 | -6.31 |
| 21 | 1978 | 1658 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | -102 | -84 | +101 | 41.2% | -0.57 | 4–11 (27%) | 3–7 (30%) | 91.9 | -1.33 | 1981 | 2085 | 166.5 | — | — | — | — | -7 | +24 | — | 68.4% | +1.72 | 12–7 (63%) | 1–5 (17%) | 99.1 | -8.73 |
| 22 | 1979 | 1695 | 123.1 | — | — | — | — | -131 | — | +13 | 48.9% | +0.08 | 8–8 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.5 | +1.74 | 1982 | 1946 | 157.2 | — | — | — | — | +137 | +62 | -221 | 64.4% | +1.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 4–8 (33%) | 94.3 | -1.96 |
| 23 | 1980 | 1756 | 131.7 | — | — | — | — | -144 | — | +38 | 47.9% | -0.41 | 7–12 (37%) | 6–2 (75%) | 102.2 | -2.08 | 1983 | 1971 | 163.0 | — | — | — | — | +82 | +36 | -191 | 63.4% | +1.12 | 17–8 (68%) | 6–8 (43%) | 100.3 | -1.30 |
| 24 | 1981 | 1809 | 135.3 | — | — | — | — | -128 | -307 | +95 | 49.5% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 5–5 (50%) | 103.7 | -3.62 | 1984 | 1880 | 145.2 | — | — | — | — | +103 | +50 | -140 | 58.5% | +0.42 | 10–4 (71%) | 5–0 (100%) | 105.7 | -0.38 |
| 25 | 1982 | 1706 | 123.4 | — | — | — | — | -98 | -215 | +169 | 47.3% | -0.34 | 5–11 (31%) | 9–3 (75%) | 100.0 | +0.16 | 1985 | 1868 | 147.5 | — | — | — | — | +28 | +92 | — | 59.5% | +0.67 | 4–3 (57%) | 5–3 (63%) | 99.6 | -2.52 |
| 26 | 1983 | 1693 | 127.0 | — | — | — | — | -32 | -138 | +114 | 46.3% | -0.46 | 7–8 (47%) | 7–6 (54%) | 102.2 | +0.86 | 1986 | 1804 | 136.3 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +158 | -98 | 51.6% | -0.02 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.6 | -0.59 |
| 27 | 1984 | 1632 | 126.6 | — | — | — | — | +58 | -142 | +116 | 41.4% | -0.51 | 5–7 (42%) | 7–3 (70%) | 99.2 | +0.78 | 1987 | 1920 | 155.2 | — | — | — | — | +18 | +3 | -153 | 62.2% | +0.91 | 7–10 (41%) | 3–5 (38%) | 96.5 | -1.48 |
| 28 | 1985 | 1714 | 129.7 | — | — | — | — | -25 | — | +88 | 54.2% | +0.36 | 7–4 (64%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.14 | 1988 | 1919 | 153.4 | — | — | — | — | +53 | +15 | -188 | 61.6% | +0.85 | 14–5 (74%) | 5–4 (56%) | 102.8 | -1.02 |
| 29 | 1986 | 1700 | 131.2 | — | — | — | — | -55 | — | +170 | 51.8% | +0.01 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–3 (57%) | 98.8 | +1.52 | 1989 | 1806 | 132.5 | — | — | — | — | +29 | +122 | — | 52.9% | +0.26 | 9–1 (90%) | 4–4 (50%) | 103.4 | +0.41 |
| 30 | 1987 | 1646 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | -24 | — | +150 | 46.2% | 0.00 | 5–6 (45%) | 4–5 (44%) | 97.1 | +1.59 | 1990 | 1703 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | +42 | +152 | — | 50.0% | -0.35 | 2–6 (25%) | — | — | +0.81 |
| 31 | 1988 | 1586 | 116.1 | — | — | — | — | -26 | — | +128 | 42.5% | -0.27 | 4–9 (31%) | 5–8 (38%) | 93.3 | +1.50 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1989 | 1663 | 126.1 | — | — | — | — | -56 | — | +97 | 50.6% | +0.04 | 11–6 (65%) | 3–4 (43%) | 105.8 | +1.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1990 | 1640 | 115.1 | — | — | — | — | -81 | — | +173 | 40.0% | -0.60 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–4 (33%) | 100.0 | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1991 | 1608 | 97.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -2.40 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1992 | 1561 | 105.4 | — | — | — | — | -50 | — | — | 26.7% | -1.67 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.03 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1993 | 1511 | 98.5 | — | — | — | — | -47 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.70 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1994 | 1509 | 102.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.50 | — | — | — | -0.16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1893 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | -73 | -148 | +94 | 46.5% | -0.28 | 104–129 (45%) | 70–69 (50%) | 101.0 | +0.16 | — | 2138 | 160.0 | — | — | — | — | +39 | +22 | -162 | 61.2% | +0.90 | 114–67 (63%) | 50–53 (49%) | 100.0 | -3.45 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pam Shriver | 1 | 9 | 10 | Nov 12, 1992 | H2H |
| Sue Barker | 2 | 8 | 10 | Jun 28, 1981 | H2H |
| Mary Lou Piatek | 1 | 8 | 9 | Sep 26, 1986 | H2H |
| Rosie Casals | 3 | 6 | 9 | Aug 29, 1985 | H2H |
| Virginia Wade | 1 | 8 | 9 | Jun 15, 1983 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hana Mandlikova | 7 | 11 | 18 | Mar 28, 1987 | H2H |
| Chris Evert | 2 | 15 | 17 | Oct 15, 1988 | H2H |
| Martina Navratilova | 2 | 14 | 16 | Aug 19, 1988 | H2H |
| Andrea Jaeger | 2 | 10 | 12 | Jan 8, 1983 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 3 | 8 | 11 | Nov 14, 1988 | H2H |