H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Betsy Nagelsen vs Virginia Ruzici H2H: 1-3

Virginia Ruzici holds a 3–1 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Virginia Ruzici leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Betsy Nagelsen won the 1982 Chicago third round 3-6 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Virginia Ruzici
ROU Age 71 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 28, 1982* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Betsy Nagelsen 3-6 6-1 6-3 Virginia Ruzici Match data
Jan 22, 1981* Cincinnati WTA 1000 R32 Carpet Virginia Ruzici 4-6 6-3 6-1 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Nov 2, 1979* Stockholm WTA 250 R16 Hard Virginia Ruzici 6-3 6-3 Betsy Nagelsen Match data
Jun 6, 1974* Roland Garros Grand Slam R64 Clay Virginia Ruzici 6-3 3-6 6-2 Betsy Nagelsen Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Virginia Ruzici #264 #16 5 2,121 458 274 62.6% 1 0 0 1 18 20

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Betsy Nagelsen Virginia Ruzici
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1 — — — — — — —
16 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
18 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3 1973 4–9 30.8% — 1,494 0 0
19 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3 1974 20–18 52.6% — 1,651 0 2
20 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3 1975 7–7 50.0% — 1,687 0 3
21 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3 1976 30–20 60.0% — 1,796 0 3
22 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5 1977 23–21 52.3% — 1,918 0 4
23 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5 1978 59–26 69.4% — 2,093 1 8
24 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6 1979 52–27 65.8% — 1,966 1 8
25 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6 1980 73–26 73.7% — 2,027 1 12
26 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6 1981 61–30 67.0% — 1,920 1 14
27 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6 1982 49–21 70.0% — 1,982 1 18
28 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6 1983 27–17 61.4% — 1,905 1 19
29 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6 1984 21–23 47.7% #44 1,780 1 19
30 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6 1985 27–19 58.7% #48 1,786 1 20
31 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6 1986 0–2 0.0% #185 1,734 1 20
32 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6 1987 5–7 41.7% #143 1,658 1 20
33 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6 — — — — — — —
34 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6 — — — — — — —
35 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6 — — — — — — —
36 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6 — — — — — — —
37 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6 — — — — — — —