H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Betty Ann Grubb vs Mary Mclean H2H: 2-0
Betty Ann Grubb holds a 2–0 lead over Mary Mclean in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Betty Ann Grubb leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Betty Ann Grubb won the 1975 Mission Viejo second round 6-2 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 1975* | Mission Viejo | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Betty Ann Grubb | 6-2 3-6 6-2 | Mary Mclean | Match data |
| Jul 18, 1968* | Milwaukee | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Betty Ann Grubb | 6-4 6-2 | Mary Mclean | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Mary Mclean | — | — | — | 1,508 | 19 | 42 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Betty Ann Grubb | Mary Mclean | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 | 1968 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,454 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,405 | 0 | 0 |
| 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 | 1972 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,360 | 0 | 0 |
| 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,345 | 0 | 0 |
| 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 8–8 | 50.0% | — | 1,424 | 0 | 0 |
| 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 8–12 | 40.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |