H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Betty Stove vs Betty Ann Grubb H2H: 0-2
Betty Ann Grubb holds a 2–0 lead over Betty Stove in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Betty Ann Grubb leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Betty Ann Grubb won the 1979 Houston third round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 18, 1979* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Betty Ann Grubb | 6-3 6-3 | Betty Stove | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1969* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Betty Ann Grubb | 6-1 6-3 | Betty Stove | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betty Stove | — | — | — | 2,165 | 413 | 304 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Betty Ann Grubb | — | — | — | 1,822 | 124 | 112 | 52.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Betty Stove | Betty Ann Grubb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1969 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 21–8 | 72.4% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 1970 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 29–14 | 67.4% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 5 |
| 1971 | 48–28 | 63.2% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 5 |
| 1972 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 1,959 | 0 | 6 | 1971 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,687 | 0 | 5 |
| 1973 | 37–27 | 57.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | 1972 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 6 |
| 1974 | 24–20 | 54.5% | — | 1,954 | 0 | 7 | 1973 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 7 |
| 1975 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,953 | 0 | 7 | 1974 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 |
| 1976 | 37–20 | 64.9% | — | 2,076 | 0 | 7 | 1975 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,729 | 0 | 7 |
| 1977 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 2,069 | 0 | 7 | 1976 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,684 | 0 | 7 |
| 1978 | 51–24 | 68.0% | — | 2,090 | 0 | 7 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 7 |
| 1979 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 7 | 1978 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 7 |
| 1980 | 24–23 | 51.1% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 7 | 1979 | 25–26 | 49.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 1981 | 5–20 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 7 | 1980 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 7 |
| 1982 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |
| 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |