H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Betty Stove vs Kathrin Keil H2H: 1-0
Betty Stove holds a 1–0 lead over Kathrin Keil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Betty Stove leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Betty Stove won the 1981 Atlanta third round 3-6 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 81
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 63
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 1981* | Atlanta | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Betty Stove | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | Kathrin Keil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Betty Stove | — | — | — | 2,165 | 413 | 304 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Kathrin Keil | — | — | — | 1,703 | 45 | 55 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Betty Stove | Kathrin Keil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–8 | 52.9% | — | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1969 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,616 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1970 | 16–19 | 45.7% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 3–11 | 21.4% | — | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1971 | 48–28 | 63.2% | — | 1,791 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1972 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 1,959 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1973 | 37–27 | 57.8% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1974 | 24–20 | 54.5% | — | 1,954 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1975 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,953 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1976 | 37–20 | 64.9% | — | 2,076 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1977 | 46–25 | 64.8% | — | 2,069 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1978 | 51–24 | 68.0% | — | 2,090 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1979 | 26–24 | 52.0% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1980 | 24–23 | 51.1% | — | 1,862 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1981 | 5–20 | 20.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1982 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1983 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |