H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Beverly Bowes vs Cecilia Dahlman H2H: 1-0
Beverly Bowes holds a 1–0 lead over Cecilia Dahlman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beverly Bowes leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Beverly Bowes won the 1990 Geneva third round 6-1 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 57
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 1990* | Geneva | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Beverly Bowes | 6-1 4-6 6-3 | Cecilia Dahlman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beverly Bowes | #597 | #49 | 16 | 1,678 | 69 | 120 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Cecilia Dahlman | #405 | #63 | 17 | 1,673 | 38 | 63 | 37.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beverly Bowes | Cecilia Dahlman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #165 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #75 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,640 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #62 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #189 | 1,495 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #101 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,499 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #192 | 1,513 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #113 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #130 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #426 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |