H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Beverly Bowes vs Donna Faber H2H: 1-1
Beverly Bowes and Donna Faber are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Beverly Bowes leads 1–0 on clay, while Donna Faber leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Beverly Bowes won the 1992 Amelia Island second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1992* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Beverly Bowes | 6-2 6-0 | Donna Faber | Match data |
| Feb 4, 1989* | Auckland | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Donna Faber | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Beverly Bowes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beverly Bowes | #597 | #49 | 16 | 1,678 | 69 | 120 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Donna Faber | #227 | #55 | 19 | 1,718 | 68 | 97 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beverly Bowes | Donna Faber | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #218 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #131 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #99 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #116 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #75 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #227 | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #62 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #101 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #113 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #130 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #426 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |