H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Beverly Bowes vs Jill Hetherington H2H: 1-1
Beverly Bowes and Jill Hetherington are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Hetherington won the 1988 Wellington fourth round 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 61
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 1988* | Wellington | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jill Hetherington | 6-3 7-6 | Beverly Bowes | Match data |
| Jan 28, 1988* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Beverly Bowes | 6-4 6-3 | Jill Hetherington | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beverly Bowes | #597 | #49 | 16 | 1,678 | 69 | 120 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jill Hetherington | #748 | #64 | 12 | 1,645 | 30 | 57 | 34.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beverly Bowes | Jill Hetherington | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #118 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #75 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #386 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #62 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #101 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #81 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #122 | 1,528 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #247 | 1,479 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #113 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #130 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #277 | 1,456 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #426 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #468 | 1,436 | 0 | 1 |