H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Beverly Bowes vs Jo Anne Faull H2H: 0-1
Jo Anne Faull holds a 1–0 lead over Beverly Bowes in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jo Anne Faull leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jo Anne Faull won the 1989 Sydney second round 3-6 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 1989* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Jo Anne Faull | 3-6 6-1 6-1 | Beverly Bowes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beverly Bowes | #597 | #49 | 16 | 1,678 | 69 | 120 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jo Anne Faull | — | — | — | 1,718 | 32 | 62 | 34.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Beverly Bowes | Jo Anne Faull | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| -1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–16 | 20.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–7 | 22.2% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #75 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #62 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,444 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #101 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #113 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #130 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #426 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |