H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Beverly Bowes vs Maria Strandlund Tomsvik H2H: 0-2
Maria Strandlund Tomsvik holds a 2–0 lead over Beverly Bowes in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Maria Strandlund Tomsvik won the 1990 US Open first round 4-6 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1990* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 4-6 6-1 6-2 | Beverly Bowes | Match data |
| Dec 1, 1988* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | 6-2 6-3 | Beverly Bowes | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beverly Bowes | #597 | #49 | 16 | 1,678 | 69 | 120 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | — | — | — | 1,626 | 42 | 77 | 35.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Beverly Bowes | Maria Strandlund Tomsvik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–16 | 30.4% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #75 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 6–12 | 33.3% | — | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #62 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #101 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–13 | 38.1% | — | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #113 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #130 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #426 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |