H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Beverly Bowes vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 0-2

Patricia Hy Boulais holds a 2–0 lead over Beverly Bowes in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Patricia Hy Boulais leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Patricia Hy Boulais won the 1993 Hong Kong Open round of 16 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Beverly Bowes
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Patricia Hy Boulais
CAN Age 61 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-2 6-4 Beverly Bowes #131 Match data Sep 17, 1993* R16 Hong Kong Open Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Patricia Hy Boulais 6-4 6-3 Beverly Bowes #146 Match data Jan 16, 1991* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Beverly Bowes #597 #49 16 1,676 69 120 36.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Patricia Hy Boulais — — — 1,906 142 165 46.3% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Beverly Bowes Patricia Hy Boulais
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1983 3–6 33.3% — 1,526 0 0 1983 7–8 46.7% — 1,546 0 0
18 1984 1–5 16.7% #161 1,482 0 0 1984 0–2 0.0% — 1,522 0 0
19 1985 6–6 50.0% #170 1,526 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 6–8 42.9% #100 1,585 0 0 1986 8–1 88.9% — 1,633 0 1
21 1987 7–18 28.0% #75 1,590 0 0 1987 9–15 37.5% — 1,594 0 1
22 1988 14–19 42.4% #62 1,639 0 0 1988 0–5 0.0% — 1,548 0 1
23 1989 13–19 40.6% #101 1,618 0 0 1989 1–4 20.0% — 1,514 0 1
24 1990 5–13 27.8% #147 1,536 0 0 1990 7–7 50.0% — 1,573 0 1
25 1991 2–5 28.6% #156 1,520 0 0 1991 18–17 51.4% — 1,704 0 1
26 1992 3–8 27.3% #113 1,510 0 0 1992 22–16 57.9% — 1,876 0 1
27 1993 8–11 42.1% #130 1,551 0 0 1993 21–15 58.3% — 1,851 0 1
28 1994 1–2 33.3% #426 1,557 0 0 1994 15–16 48.4% — 1,756 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 1995 11–14 44.0% — 1,691 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 1996 10–16 38.5% — 1,687 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 1997 12–19 38.7% — 1,663 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1998 1–8 11.1% — 1,573 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Beverly Bowes Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1983 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1983 5 3 8 62.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — 5 0 5 100.0%
21 1987 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1987 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1988 11 13 24 45.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1988 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1989 12 13 25 48.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1990 3 8 11 27.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — 1990 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1991 13 11 24 54.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 8 5 13 61.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1993 10 9 19 52.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
28 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 11 9 20 55.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 5 8 13 38.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 7 8 12.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 4 10 14 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
Career — 44 66 110 40.0% 19 33 52 36.5% 1 11 12 8.3% 2 8 10 20.0% — 72 85 157 45.9% 28 39 67 41.8% 27 23 50 54.0% 15 18 33 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Beverly Bowes Patricia Hy Boulais
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1493 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1477 98.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.18
17 1983 1527 109.4 — — — — — +94 — 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.4 -0.02 1983 1546 117.5 — — — — +51 — +83 46.9% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.93
18 1984 1483 102.6 — — — — +16 — — 28.6% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.56 1984 1523 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 0–1 — +0.06
19 1985 1526 113.9 — — — — -36 +84 — 50.0% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1585 113.1 — — — — -13 — — 44.8% -0.52 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.61 1986 1633 110.5 — — — — +41 — — 69.6% +1.65 5–0 (100%) 1–2 (33%) — +2.61
21 1987 1590 126.7 — — — — -36 +54 -102 32.1% -1.34 4–4 (50%) 0–4 (0%) 99.5 -1.69 1987 1595 115.4 — — — — +48 — +10 37.5% -0.93 5–3 (63%) 1–6 (14%) 97.9 -0.17
22 1988 1640 128.2 — — — — -42 -20 — 44.4% -0.44 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.80 1988 1548 99.0 — — — — +29 — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–2 — -0.27
23 1989 1618 121.7 — — — — +15 -8 — 43.6% -0.61 6–8 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 +0.13 1989 1515 91.9 — — — — +9 — — 20.0% -2.30 — — — +0.31
24 1990 1537 112.4 — — — — +27 +14 — 34.8% -0.67 4–6 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 95.7 +0.22 1990 1574 118.5 — — — — +7 — — 51.7% +0.41 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.67
25 1991 1521 98.6 — — — — +25 -2 — 35.3% -1.35 1–2 (33%) — — +0.30 1991 1704 141.1 — — — — -20 -265 +2 50.0% +0.11 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) 104.8 -0.45
26 1992 1511 111.3 — — — — +22 +24 — 32.0% -1.16 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.14 1992 1877 155.6 — — — — -71 -231 -109 56.3% +0.35 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 107.4 -1.82
27 1993 1552 118.8 — — — — +24 -12 — 42.9% -0.50 2–2 (50%) — — +0.50 1993 1852 141.8 — — — — -46 -170 +3 57.0% +0.38 6–3 (67%) 4–3 (57%) 105.0 -1.32
28 1994 1558 112.1 — — — — +22 — — 28.6% -2.43 1–0 — — -0.33 1994 1756 132.7 — — — — +24 -99 — 52.4% +0.25 2–3 (40%) 3–1 (75%) 99.3 -0.60
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1691 125.6 — — — — +15 -27 — 50.0% -0.18 3–9 (25%) 3–2 (60%) 93.7 +0.06
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1687 132.9 — — — — -41 -41 +161 40.0% -0.73 4–4 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.0 -1.41
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1664 129.6 — — — — -71 +1 +194 40.3% -0.58 8–7 (53%) 2–5 (29%) 99.0 -0.88
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1574 92.9 — — — — -25 -9 — 26.1% -2.00 1–4 (20%) 1–1 — -0.04
Career — 1677 124.6 — — — — -4 +21 -102 39.6% -0.78 26–34 (43%) 8–18 (31%) 93.9 -0.15 — 1906 138.1 — — — — -10 -116 +43 47.1% -0.18 50–44 (53%) 22–33 (40%) 98.3 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.