H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Beverly Bowes vs Susan Sloane Lundy H2H: 1-3
Susan Sloane Lundy holds a 3–1 lead over Beverly Bowes in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Susan Sloane Lundy leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Susan Sloane Lundy won the 1990 Scottsdale third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 60
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 18, 1990* | Scottsdale | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-4 6-4 | Beverly Bowes | Match data |
| Nov 10, 1989* | Nashville | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-2 7-6 | Beverly Bowes | Match data |
| Oct 23, 1988* | Nashville | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Susan Sloane Lundy | 6-3 6-2 | Beverly Bowes | Match data |
| Aug 29, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Beverly Bowes | 6-4 6-3 | Susan Sloane Lundy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beverly Bowes | #597 | #49 | 16 | 1,678 | 69 | 120 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Susan Sloane Lundy | — | — | — | 1,884 | 96 | 94 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Beverly Bowes | Susan Sloane Lundy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1983 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–14 | 41.7% | — | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #100 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #75 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #62 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 22–16 | 57.9% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #101 | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #147 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #113 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #130 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #426 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |