H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Beverly Mould vs Ginny Purdy H2H: 0-1

Ginny Purdy holds a 1–0 lead over Beverly Mould in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ginny Purdy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Ginny Purdy won the 1985 Marco Island round of 64 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Beverly Mould
RSA Age 64 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Ginny Purdy
USA Age 59

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ginny Purdy 6-1 6-2 Beverly Mould Match data Jan 30, 1985* R64 Marco Island WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Beverly Mould #46 #46 — 1,666 32 46 41.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ginny Purdy — — — 1,667 26 36 41.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Beverly Mould Ginny Purdy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1983 13–8 61.9% — 1,652 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1984 5–14 26.3% — 1,564 0 1
18 1980 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0 1985 6–11 35.3% — 1,532 0 1
19 1981 7–7 50.0% — 1,520 0 0 1986 2–2 50.0% — 1,548 0 1
20 1982 6–6 50.0% — 1,574 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% — 1,534 0 1
21 1983 5–6 45.5% — 1,599 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1984 10–14 41.7% #46 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1985 3–12 20.0% — 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Beverly Mould Ginny Purdy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1980 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1 4 5 20.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — — — — —
19 1981 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1986 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1985 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 10 17 27 37.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 12 15 27 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% — 11 14 25 44.0% 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Beverly Mould Ginny Purdy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1652 112.4 — — — — +74 -86 — 55.8% -0.12 3–2 (60%) 6–2 (75%) 105.1 +2.89
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1564 105.4 — — — — +90 -48 — 32.6% -0.93 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.4 +0.70
18 1980 1505 99.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.23 1985 1532 95.6 — — — — +60 -28 — 35.9% -1.26 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 100.3 +1.11
19 1981 1521 115.2 — — — — — — — 53.3% +0.83 0–2 0–6 (0%) — +1.08 1986 1548 97.8 — — — — +47 — — 44.4% -1.33 1–0 1–0 — +0.41
20 1982 1575 120.3 — — — — — +20 +30 55.2% -0.04 1–4 (20%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.29 1987 1534 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.01
21 1983 1600 117.3 — — — — +18 +52 — 47.8% -0.30 0–1 1–0 — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1984 1647 123.3 — — — — -41 — -1 41.8% -0.45 4–3 (57%) 4–2 (67%) 105.0 +0.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1985 1537 101.2 — — — — -37 — +81 25.7% -1.51 2–3 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 97.7 +0.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1667 120.3 — — — — -28 +34 +25 43.8% -0.35 7–13 (35%) 9–12 (43%) 94.1 +4.15 — 1668 104.2 — — — — +73 -43 — 41.2% -0.83 8–8 (50%) 9–8 (53%) 102.5 +8.26

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.