H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Bianka Lamade vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 1-0

Bianka Lamade holds a 1–0 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bianka Lamade leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bianka Lamade won the 2002 Indian Wells Open round of 128 6-2 1-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Bianka Lamade
GER Age 44 Right-Handed 184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Barbara Rittner
GER Age 53 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bianka Lamade #75 6-2 1-6 6-4 Barbara Rittner #71 Match data Mar 6, 2002 R128 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Bianka Lamade #1,261 #59 538 1,668 21 28 42.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Barbara Rittner #438 #24 661 1,896 211 218 49.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Bianka Lamade Barbara Rittner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2000 3–2 60.0% #126 1,542 0 0 1990 3–3 50.0% #110 1,557 0 0
18 2001 14–12 53.8% #67 1,627 0 1 1991 20–17 54.1% #43 1,708 0 0
19 2002 4–13 23.5% #223 1,537 0 1 1992 25–16 61.0% #29 1,850 0 1
20 2003 0–1 0.0% #178 1,527 0 1 1993 24–17 58.5% #34 1,843 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1994 25–18 58.1% #40 1,819 0 1
22 — — — — — — — 1995 17–17 50.0% #51 1,729 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1996 12–16 42.9% #47 1,727 0 1
24 — — — — — — — 1997 10–17 37.0% #71 1,652 0 1
25 — — — — — — — 1998 13–14 48.1% #66 1,663 0 1
26 — — — — — — — 1999 15–18 45.5% #59 1,654 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2000 10–12 45.5% #99 1,661 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2001 16–18 47.1% #68 1,618 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 2002 14–19 42.4% #66 1,631 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 2003 6–14 30.0% #120 1,567 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 2004 1–2 33.3% #235 1,570 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Bianka Lamade Barbara Rittner
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2000 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2001 7 3 10 70.0% 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
19 2002 2 5 7 28.6% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1992 13 7 20 65.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 2003 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 13 10 23 56.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 11 8 19 57.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 6 8 14 42.9% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 5 6 11 45.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 7 10 30.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 4 6 33.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 4 7 42.9% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 9 15 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 6 10 16 37.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2 7 9 22.2% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 9 9 18 50.0% 10 16 26 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — 83 93 176 47.2% 73 74 147 49.7% 18 19 37 48.6% 37 32 69 53.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Bianka Lamade Barbara Rittner
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2000 1542 112.0 — — — — — +40 — 58.3% +0.17 1–1 — — +0.15 1990 1557 121.6 — — — — +35 — — 36.4% -1.18 1–0 1–0 — -0.40
18 2001 1628 123.2 — — — — -38 +12 — 49.1% -0.16 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 102.9 +0.29 1991 1709 130.4 — — — — +4 -111 — 52.9% +0.15 7–6 (54%) 5–2 (71%) 106.0 +1.01
19 2002 1537 104.6 — — — — +28 +5 +27 28.2% -1.56 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — -0.54 1992 1850 151.2 — — — — -12 -152 -246 57.8% +0.43 5–2 (71%) 3–4 (43%) 103.8 -1.88
20 2003 1527 98.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.14 1993 1844 151.4 — — — — +11 -88 — 60.9% +0.72 2–7 (22%) 6–4 (60%) 96.7 -1.04
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1820 146.5 — — — — +35 -80 -177 58.9% +0.85 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 96.8 -1.12
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1729 138.0 — — — — +52 -26 — 53.9% +0.47 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 96.7 -0.26
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1728 144.8 — — — — +59 -24 — 46.7% -0.05 0–4 (0%) 1–1 — -1.28
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1653 135.9 — — — — +28 +52 -38 42.9% -0.07 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 -1.13
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1664 132.7 — — — — -29 +97 — 48.4% +0.21 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -0.20
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1655 126.4 — — — — +7 +43 -46 45.8% -0.24 5–5 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 100.6 -0.69
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1661 124.8 — — — — +33 -20 -41 48.1% 0.00 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.8 -0.48
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1619 127.0 — — — — +17 +56 +14 50.6% +0.30 5–8 (38%) 6–4 (60%) 97.9 -0.24
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1632 131.4 — — — — 0 +51 -45 44.7% -0.11 8–6 (57%) 3–6 (33%) 100.7 -0.85
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1568 107.0 -0.66 -2.21 0.611 40.9% -12 +39 +86 35.4% -1.04 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 97.2 -0.85
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1571 109.3 -1.05 +2.64 0.990 49.4% — +36 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — -0.31
Career — 1669 116.2 — — — — -11 +16 +27 41.8% -0.67 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 100.9 -0.49 — 1897 144.7 -0.82 -0.27 0.767 44.3% +16 -11 -47 50.7% +0.17 61–74 (45%) 39–39 (50%) 96.9 -2.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.