H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Bianka Lamade vs Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie H2H: 1-0
Bianka Lamade holds a 1–0 lead over Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Bianka Lamade leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Bianka Lamade won the 2001 Rome second round 7-6(3) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 43
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 53
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2001* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Bianka Lamade | 7-6(3) 7-5 | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bianka Lamade | #1,261 | #59 | 538 | 1,671 | 21 | 28 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | — | — | — | 1,961 | 186 | 180 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bianka Lamade | Ruxandra Dragomir Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #126 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #67 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #223 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–15 | 46.4% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 17–16 | 51.5% | — | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 31–15 | 67.4% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | — | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 9–17 | 34.6% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,508 | 0 | 4 |