H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Bianka Lamade vs Seda Noorlander H2H: 2-0
Bianka Lamade holds a 2–0 lead over Seda Noorlander in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bianka Lamade leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Bianka Lamade won the 2002 Palermo third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 43
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 52
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2002* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Bianka Lamade | 6-4 6-2 | Seda Noorlander | Match data |
| Jun 17, 2001* | Tashkent | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Bianka Lamade | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Seda Noorlander | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bianka Lamade | #1,261 | #59 | 538 | 1,671 | 21 | 28 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Seda Noorlander | #892 | #80 | 393 | 1,540 | 24 | 56 | 30.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Bianka Lamade | Seda Noorlander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2000 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #126 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #67 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #223 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #306 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #297 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #200 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #114 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #80 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #175 | 1,447 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #100 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #166 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #151 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #342 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |