H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Billie Jean King vs Andrea Leand H2H: 1-0
Billie Jean King holds a 1–0 lead over Andrea Leand in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Billie Jean King leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Billie Jean King won the 1982 Los Angeles quarterfinal 3-6 6-0 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 82
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1982* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Billie Jean King | 3-6 6-0 7-6 | Andrea Leand | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billie Jean King | #22 | #13 | — | 2,402 | 684 | 160 | 81.0% | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 59 | 72 |
| Andrea Leand | #857 | #27 | 13 | 1,883 | 83 | 104 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Billie Jean King | Andrea Leand | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 29–22 | 56.9% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | — | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #35 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #33 | 1,681 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #214 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1968 | 40–5 | 88.9% | — | 1,823 | 2 | 6 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1969 | 58–14 | 80.6% | — | 2,043 | 2 | 11 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #152 | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1970 | 47–11 | 81.0% | — | 2,172 | 2 | 16 | 1990 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #142 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1971 | 114–15 | 88.4% | — | 2,293 | 3 | 33 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #180 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1972 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,341 | 6 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1973 | 56–12 | 82.4% | — | 2,294 | 7 | 50 | 1993 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1974 | 54–8 | 87.1% | — | 2,300 | 8 | 56 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #461 | 1,473 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1975 | 23–3 | 88.5% | — | 2,370 | 9 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 2,316 | 9 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 46–6 | 88.5% | — | 2,386 | 9 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 28–12 | 70.0% | — | 2,301 | 9 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 36–13 | 73.5% | — | 2,164 | 9 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 39–15 | 72.2% | — | 2,122 | 9 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 2,019 | 9 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1982 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,932 | 9 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1983 | 22–5 | 81.5% | — | 2,052 | 9 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |