H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Billie Jean King vs Ann Kiyomura Hayashi H2H: 4-2

Billie Jean King holds a 4–2 lead over Ann Kiyomura Hayashi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet, while Billie Jean King leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Billie Jean King won the 1983 Birmingham fourth round 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Billie Jean King
Age 82 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi
Age 70 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 7, 1983* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Billie Jean King 6-2 6-1 Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Match data
Mar 19, 1982* Boston WTA 250 R16 Carpet Billie Jean King 6-4 6-2 Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Match data
Feb 4, 1982* Detroit WTA 250 R32 Carpet Ann Kiyomura Hayashi 3-6 6-3 1-0 (ret.) Billie Jean King Match data
Sep 25, 1980* Atlanta WTA 250 R32 Carpet Billie Jean King 4-6 7-5 6-4 Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Match data
Aug 16, 1979* Richmond WTA 250 R32 Carpet Ann Kiyomura Hayashi 6-1 1-6 6-2 Billie Jean King Match data
Sep 19, 1974* Orlando WTA 250 R32 Clay Billie Jean King 6-2 4-6 6-0 Ann Kiyomura Hayashi Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Billie Jean King #22 #13 — 2,402 684 160 81.0% 9 1 0 3 59 72
Ann Kiyomura Hayashi — — — 1,924 182 200 47.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Billie Jean King Ann Kiyomura Hayashi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 — — — — — — — 1968 0–1 0.0% — 1,488 0 0
13 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,473 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1970 0–1 0.0% — 1,459 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1971 0–1 0.0% — 1,456 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1972 5–4 55.6% — 1,515 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1973 28–30 48.3% — 1,649 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1974 24–13 64.9% — 1,789 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1975 7–12 36.8% — 1,770 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1976 9–16 36.0% — 1,714 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 1977 4–8 33.3% — 1,731 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 1978 10–7 58.8% — 1,803 0 1
23 — — — — — — — 1979 26–22 54.2% — 1,873 0 1
24 1968 40–5 88.9% — 1,823 2 6 1980 13–20 39.4% — 1,719 0 1
25 1969 58–14 80.6% — 2,043 2 11 1981 23–19 54.8% — 1,853 0 2
26 1970 47–11 81.0% — 2,172 2 16 1982 18–20 47.4% — 1,827 0 2
27 1971 114–15 88.4% — 2,293 3 33 1983 13–20 39.4% — 1,713 0 2
28 1972 89–15 85.6% — 2,341 6 43 1984 2–5 28.6% — 1,684 0 2
29 1973 56–12 82.4% — 2,294 7 50 — — — — — — —
30 1974 54–8 87.1% — 2,300 8 56 — — — — — — —
31 1975 23–3 88.5% — 2,370 9 58 — — — — — — —
32 1976 2–2 50.0% — 2,316 9 58 — — — — — — —
33 1977 46–6 88.5% — 2,386 9 64 — — — — — — —
34 1978 28–12 70.0% — 2,301 9 64 — — — — — — —
35 1979 36–13 73.5% — 2,164 9 66 — — — — — — —
36 1980 39–15 72.2% — 2,122 9 69 — — — — — — —
37 1981 4–5 44.4% — 2,019 9 69 — — — — — — —
38 1982 26–19 57.8% — 1,932 9 70 — — — — — — —
39 1983 22–5 81.5% — 2,052 9 72 — — — — — — —