H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Billie Jean King vs Chris Oneil H2H: 1-0
Billie Jean King holds a 1–0 lead over Chris Oneil in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Billie Jean King leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Billie Jean King won the 1979 US Open second round 6-0 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1979* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Billie Jean King | 6-0 6-3 | Chris Oneil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billie Jean King | #22 | #13 | — | 2,402 | 684 | 160 | 81.0% | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 59 | 72 |
| Chris Oneil | — | — | — | 1,768 | 99 | 108 | 47.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Billie Jean King | Chris Oneil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 40–5 | 88.9% | — | 1,823 | 2 | 6 | 1972 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 2 |
| 1969 | 58–14 | 80.6% | — | 2,043 | 2 | 11 | 1973 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 2 |
| 1970 | 47–11 | 81.0% | — | 2,172 | 2 | 16 | 1974 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 114–15 | 88.4% | — | 2,293 | 3 | 33 | 1975 | 30–17 | 63.8% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 4 |
| 1972 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,341 | 6 | 43 | 1976 | 14–6 | 70.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 7 |
| 1973 | 56–12 | 82.4% | — | 2,294 | 7 | 50 | 1977 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,636 | 0 | 7 |
| 1974 | 54–8 | 87.1% | — | 2,300 | 8 | 56 | 1978 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,714 | 1 | 8 |
| 1975 | 23–3 | 88.5% | — | 2,370 | 9 | 58 | 1979 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,632 | 1 | 8 |
| 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 2,316 | 9 | 58 | 1980 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,577 | 1 | 8 |
| 1977 | 46–6 | 88.5% | — | 2,386 | 9 | 64 | 1981 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,555 | 1 | 9 |
| 1978 | 28–12 | 70.0% | — | 2,301 | 9 | 64 | 1982 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,598 | 1 | 9 |
| 1979 | 36–13 | 73.5% | — | 2,164 | 9 | 66 | 1983 | 5–15 | 25.0% | — | 1,528 | 1 | 9 |
| 1980 | 39–15 | 72.2% | — | 2,122 | 9 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 2,019 | 9 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,932 | 9 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 22–5 | 81.5% | — | 2,052 | 9 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |