H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Billie Jean King vs Iva Budarova H2H: 0-1
Iva Budarova holds a 1–0 lead over Billie Jean King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iva Budarova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iva Budarova won the 1982 Montreal third round 4-6 6-3 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 82
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1982* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Iva Budarova | 4-6 6-3 3-1 (ret.) | Billie Jean King | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billie Jean King | #22 | #13 | — | 2,402 | 684 | 160 | 81.0% | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 59 | 72 |
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Billie Jean King | Iva Budarova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1968 | 40–5 | 88.9% | — | 1,823 | 2 | 6 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1969 | 58–14 | 80.6% | — | 2,043 | 2 | 11 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1970 | 47–11 | 81.0% | — | 2,172 | 2 | 16 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1971 | 114–15 | 88.4% | — | 2,293 | 3 | 33 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1972 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,341 | 6 | 43 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1973 | 56–12 | 82.4% | — | 2,294 | 7 | 50 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1974 | 54–8 | 87.1% | — | 2,300 | 8 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1975 | 23–3 | 88.5% | — | 2,370 | 9 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 2,316 | 9 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1977 | 46–6 | 88.5% | — | 2,386 | 9 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1978 | 28–12 | 70.0% | — | 2,301 | 9 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1979 | 36–13 | 73.5% | — | 2,164 | 9 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1980 | 39–15 | 72.2% | — | 2,122 | 9 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1981 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 2,019 | 9 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 1982 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,932 | 9 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 1983 | 22–5 | 81.5% | — | 2,052 | 9 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |