H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC

Billie Jean King vs Kate Latham H2H: 1-1

Billie Jean King and Kate Latham are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on carpet, while Billie Jean King leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1981 Boston third round 6-3 6-0.

Age 82 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
Age 73

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 19, 1981* Boston WTA 250 R32 Carpet Kate Latham 6-3 6-0 Billie Jean King Match data
Mar 25, 1977* San Antonio WTA 250 QF Hard Billie Jean King 6-4 6-2 Kate Latham Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Billie Jean King #22 #13 2,402 684 160 81.0% 9 1 0 3 59 72
Kate Latham 1,866 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Billie Jean King Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% 1,489 0 0
17 1970 1–3 25.0% 1,476 0 0
19 1972 3–3 50.0% 1,503 0 0
20 1973 6–7 46.2% 1,587 0 0
21 1974 40–16 71.4% 1,844 0 3
22 1975 15–20 42.9% 1,690 0 3
23 1976 4–2 66.7% 1,680 0 3
24 1968 40–5 88.9% 1,823 2 6 1977 15–12 55.6% 1,755 0 3
25 1969 58–14 80.6% 2,043 2 11 1978 13–17 43.3% 1,661 0 3
26 1970 47–11 81.0% 2,172 2 16 1979 21–23 47.7% 1,848 0 3
27 1971 114–15 88.4% 2,293 3 33 1980 23–22 51.1% 1,750 0 4
28 1972 89–15 85.6% 2,341 6 43 1981 21–20 51.2% 1,774 0 5
29 1973 56–12 82.4% 2,294 7 50 1982 24–28 46.2% 1,688 0 5
30 1974 54–8 87.1% 2,300 8 56 1983 9–16 36.0% 1,625 0 6
31 1975 23–3 88.5% 2,370 9 58 1984 0–11 0.0% 1,494 0 6
32 1976 2–2 50.0% 2,316 9 58 1985 3–1 75.0% 1,528 0 6
33 1977 46–6 88.5% 2,386 9 64
34 1978 28–12 70.0% 2,301 9 64
35 1979 36–13 73.5% 2,164 9 66
36 1980 39–15 72.2% 2,122 9 69
37 1981 4–5 44.4% 2,019 9 69
38 1982 26–19 57.8% 1,932 9 70
39 1983 22–5 81.5% 2,052 9 72