H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Billie Jean King vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 3-1

Billie Jean King holds a 3–1 lead over Mima Jausovec in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Billie Jean King leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1982 Los Angeles semifinal 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Billie Jean King
Age 82 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 69 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 6, 1982* Los Angeles WTA 500 SF Carpet Mima Jausovec 6-4 6-2 Billie Jean King Match data
Sep 13, 1980* Tokyo Sillook WTA 250 QF Hard Billie Jean King 6-4 6-4 Mima Jausovec Match data
Feb 14, 1980* Oakland WTA 250 R32 Carpet Billie Jean King 6-4 2-6 6-4 Mima Jausovec Match data
Jan 17, 1974* San Francisco WTA 250 R32 Hard Billie Jean King 7-6(1) 6-3 Mima Jausovec Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Billie Jean King #22 #13 — 2,402 684 160 81.0% 9 1 0 3 59 72
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,088 339 246 57.9% 1 1 0 1 4 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Billie Jean King Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,790 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,804 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1976 33–16 67.3% — 1,996 0 4
20 — — — — — — — 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,008 1 5
21 — — — — — — — 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,922 1 6
22 — — — — — — — 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,866 1 6
23 — — — — — — — 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,941 1 6
24 1968 40–5 88.9% — 1,823 2 6 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,010 1 6
25 1969 58–14 80.6% — 2,043 2 11 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,861 1 7
26 1970 47–11 81.0% — 2,172 2 16 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7
27 1971 114–15 88.4% — 2,293 3 33 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
28 1972 89–15 85.6% — 2,341 6 43 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
29 1973 56–12 82.4% — 2,294 7 50 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 1974 54–8 87.1% — 2,300 8 56 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 1975 23–3 88.5% — 2,370 9 58 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7
32 1976 2–2 50.0% — 2,316 9 58 — — — — — — —
33 1977 46–6 88.5% — 2,386 9 64 — — — — — — —
34 1978 28–12 70.0% — 2,301 9 64 — — — — — — —
35 1979 36–13 73.5% — 2,164 9 66 — — — — — — —
36 1980 39–15 72.2% — 2,122 9 69 — — — — — — —
37 1981 4–5 44.4% — 2,019 9 69 — — — — — — —
38 1982 26–19 57.8% — 1,932 9 70 — — — — — — —
39 1983 22–5 81.5% — 2,052 9 72 — — — — — — —