H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Billie Jean King vs Natasha Chmyreva H2H: 1-0

Billie Jean King holds a 1–0 lead over Natasha Chmyreva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Billie Jean King leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Billie Jean King won the 1975 Eastbourne Open round of 16 6-2-7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Billie Jean King
USA Age 82 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Natasha Chmyreva
URS Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Billie Jean King 6-2-7-5 Natasha Chmyreva Match data Jun 20, 1975* R16 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Billie Jean King #22 #2 — 2,437 684 160 81.0% 8 0 0 3 57 68
Natasha Chmyreva — — — 1,982 58 39 59.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Billie Jean King Natasha Chmyreva
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,486 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,465 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1974 5–3 62.5% — 1,542 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1975 26–13 66.7% — 1,822 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 1976 18–13 58.1% — 1,932 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1977 7–5 58.3% — 1,965 0 2
20 — — — — — — — 1978 1–0 100.0% — 1,970 0 3
21 — — — — — — — 1979 0–1 0.0% — 1,949 0 3
24 1968 40–5 88.9% — 1,865 1 1 — — — — — — —
25 1969 58–14 80.6% — 2,056 1 6 — — — — — — —
26 1970 47–11 81.0% — 2,180 1 11 — — — — — — —
27 1971 114–15 88.4% — 2,302 2 28 — — — — — — —
28 1972 89–15 85.6% — 2,378 5 39 — — — — — — —
29 1973 56–12 82.4% — 2,349 6 46 — — — — — — —
30 1974 54–8 87.1% — 2,326 7 52 — — — — — — —
31 1975 23–3 88.5% #4 2,391 8 54 — — — — — — —
32 1976 2–2 50.0% — 2,336 8 54 — — — — — — —
33 1977 46–6 88.5% #2 2,398 8 60 — — — — — — —
34 1978 28–12 70.0% #5 2,336 8 60 — — — — — — —
35 1979 36–13 73.5% #5 2,185 8 62 — — — — — — —
36 1980 39–15 72.2% #6 2,151 8 65 — — — — — — —
37 1981 4–5 44.4% — 2,043 8 65 — — — — — — —
38 1982 26–19 57.8% — 1,941 8 66 — — — — — — —
39 1983 22–5 81.5% — 2,057 8 68 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Billie Jean King Natasha Chmyreva
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1486 87.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — +0.28
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1466 97.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.13 — — — +0.65
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1543 124.3 — — — — — -6 — 62.5% +0.94 — — — +0.70
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1823 146.4 — — — — -163 -222 -54 61.1% +0.82 11–6 (65%) 3–2 (60%) 109.4 -0.66
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1932 157.3 — — — — -129 -218 -111 59.4% +0.62 4–5 (44%) 0–1 — -3.66
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1965 136.7 — — — — -83 — — 60.0% +0.60 2–0 3–2 (60%) — -1.51
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1970 102.5 — — — — — — — 66.7% -0.33 1–0 — — +0.12
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1949 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.05
24 1968 1865 141.1 — — — — -83 -273 +141 87.2% +2.72 6–2 (75%) — — +1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1969 2056 154.1 — — — — +176 -365 +42 75.5% +2.11 12–5 (71%) — — -3.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1970 2181 166.1 — — — — +139 -229 +41 75.0% +2.11 11–5 (69%) 0–1 — -9.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1971 2303 170.6 — — — — +240 -117 +9 84.6% +2.55 20–4 (83%) 16–4 (80%) 116.1 -6.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1972 2378 173.1 — — — — +144 -67 +84 82.1% +2.37 13–3 (81%) 8–7 (53%) 102.1 -8.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1973 2349 168.6 — — — — +152 -82 +159 82.7% +2.42 8–5 (62%) 9–5 (64%) 100.8 -4.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1974 2327 171.4 — — — — +153 -73 +194 81.8% +2.54 10–2 (83%) 3–2 (60%) 104.2 -3.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1975 2391 169.1 — — — — +33 — +109 85.7% +2.70 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — -2.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1976 2337 113.7 — — — — +67 — — 50.0% -0.13 — 1–0 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1977 2398 164.8 — — — — +140 -140 +131 76.9% +1.69 16–1 (94%) 5–0 (100%) 111.3 -3.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1978 2337 167.5 — — — — +44 — +160 73.7% +1.86 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 92.9 -4.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1979 2185 156.7 — — — — +75 — +139 71.4% +1.51 8–8 (50%) 9–4 (69%) 94.9 -3.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1980 2152 165.5 — — — — +100 +122 +192 69.4% +1.09 9–6 (60%) 11–4 (73%) 100.7 -3.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1981 2044 121.4 — — — — +105 — — 44.4% -0.67 — — — -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1982 1941 150.4 — — — — -6 +196 +304 56.2% +0.42 12–7 (63%) 7–5 (58%) 98.0 -2.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1983 2057 155.9 — — — — -43 — +231 79.3% +1.93 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2437 170.4 — — — — +124 -123 +121 77.5% +2.03 131–58 (69%) 74–35 (68%) 111.2 -6.96 — 1982 149.0 — — — — -122 -174 -75 58.1% +0.53 18–11 (62%) 6–5 (55%) 111.4 -4.39

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.