H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Billie Jean King vs Nina Bohm H2H: 0-1

Nina Bohm holds a 1–0 lead over Billie Jean King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nina Bohm leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nina Bohm won the 1979 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 16 3-6 7-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Billie Jean King
USA Age 82 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Nina Bohm
SWE Age 68 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nina Bohm 3-6 7-6 6-2 Billie Jean King Match data Nov 9, 1979* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Billie Jean King #22 #2 — 2,437 684 160 81.0% 8 0 0 3 57 68
Nina Bohm — — — 1,714 55 63 46.6% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Billie Jean King Nina Bohm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1975 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,530 0 1
19 — — — — — — — 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,518 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1978 11–10 52.4% — 1,648 0 1
21 — — — — — — — 1979 11–11 50.0% — 1,664 0 2
22 — — — — — — — 1980 9–14 39.1% — 1,684 0 2
23 — — — — — — — 1981 19–20 48.7% — 1,665 0 2
24 1968 40–5 88.9% — 1,865 1 1 — — — — — — —
25 1969 58–14 80.6% — 2,056 1 6 — — — — — — —
26 1970 47–11 81.0% — 2,180 1 11 — — — — — — —
27 1971 114–15 88.4% — 2,302 2 28 — — — — — — —
28 1972 89–15 85.6% — 2,378 5 39 — — — — — — —
29 1973 56–12 82.4% — 2,349 6 46 — — — — — — —
30 1974 54–8 87.1% — 2,326 7 52 — — — — — — —
31 1975 23–3 88.5% #4 2,391 8 54 — — — — — — —
32 1976 2–2 50.0% — 2,336 8 54 — — — — — — —
33 1977 46–6 88.5% #2 2,398 8 60 — — — — — — —
34 1978 28–12 70.0% #5 2,336 8 60 — — — — — — —
35 1979 36–13 73.5% #5 2,185 8 62 — — — — — — —
36 1980 39–15 72.2% #6 2,151 8 65 — — — — — — —
37 1981 4–5 44.4% — 2,043 8 65 — — — — — — —
38 1982 26–19 57.8% — 1,941 8 66 — — — — — — —
39 1983 22–5 81.5% — 2,057 8 68 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Billie Jean King Nina Bohm
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1492 103.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — -0.05
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1497 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.25 — — — +0.31
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1531 112.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.70 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.06
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1519 98.6 — — — — — — +8 50.0% -0.29 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.77
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1649 133.2 — — — — +45 — -15 53.1% +0.29 5–4 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 105.7 +0.41
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1664 113.1 — — — — +7 -148 — 48.0% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 103.4 +1.29
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1684 128.0 — — — — -108 -84 -33 40.7% -0.80 7–6 (54%) 1–3 (25%) 103.4 -1.64
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1666 120.7 — — — — -79 +16 +13 46.2% -0.24 9–6 (60%) 3–6 (33%) 100.5 +0.79
24 1968 1865 141.1 — — — — -83 -273 +141 87.2% +2.72 6–2 (75%) — — +1.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1969 2056 154.1 — — — — +176 -365 +42 75.5% +2.11 12–5 (71%) — — -3.94 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1970 2181 166.1 — — — — +139 -229 +41 75.0% +2.11 11–5 (69%) 0–1 — -9.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1971 2303 170.6 — — — — +240 -117 +9 84.6% +2.55 20–4 (83%) 16–4 (80%) 116.1 -6.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1972 2378 173.1 — — — — +144 -67 +84 82.1% +2.37 13–3 (81%) 8–7 (53%) 102.1 -8.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1973 2349 168.6 — — — — +152 -82 +159 82.7% +2.42 8–5 (62%) 9–5 (64%) 100.8 -4.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1974 2327 171.4 — — — — +153 -73 +194 81.8% +2.54 10–2 (83%) 3–2 (60%) 104.2 -3.91 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1975 2391 169.1 — — — — +33 — +109 85.7% +2.70 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — -2.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1976 2337 113.7 — — — — +67 — — 50.0% -0.13 — 1–0 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1977 2398 164.8 — — — — +140 -140 +131 76.9% +1.69 16–1 (94%) 5–0 (100%) 111.3 -3.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1978 2337 167.5 — — — — +44 — +160 73.7% +1.86 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 92.9 -4.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1979 2185 156.7 — — — — +75 — +139 71.4% +1.51 8–8 (50%) 9–4 (69%) 94.9 -3.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1980 2152 165.5 — — — — +100 +122 +192 69.4% +1.09 9–6 (60%) 11–4 (73%) 100.7 -3.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1981 2044 121.4 — — — — +105 — — 44.4% -0.67 — — — -0.51 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 1982 1941 150.4 — — — — -6 +196 +304 56.2% +0.42 12–7 (63%) 7–5 (58%) 98.0 -2.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1983 2057 155.9 — — — — -43 — +231 79.3% +1.93 2–2 (50%) 0–2 — -1.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2437 170.4 — — — — +124 -123 +121 77.5% +2.03 131–58 (69%) 74–35 (68%) 111.2 -6.96 — 1714 126.5 — — — — -47 -32 -8 46.4% -0.28 28–24 (54%) 12–17 (41%) 104.3 +1.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.