H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Billie Jean King vs Sharon Walsh Pete H2H: 7-0

Billie Jean King holds a 7–0 lead over Sharon Walsh Pete in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Billie Jean King leads 4–0 on grass and 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Billie Jean King won the 1983 Beckenham semifinal 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Billie Jean King
Age 82 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Sharon Walsh Pete
Age 74 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 4, 1983* Beckenham WTA 250 SF Grass Billie Jean King 6-3 6-4 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Feb 25, 1978* Detroit WTA 250 QF Carpet Billie Jean King 6-1 6-3 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Sep 3, 1974* US Open Grand Slam R32 Grass Billie Jean King 6-0 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Mar 1, 1974* Chicago WTA 250 R16 Carpet Billie Jean King 6-1 6-2 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Feb 24, 1974* Detroit WTA 250 R16 Carpet Billie Jean King 6-3 6-1 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Sep 7, 1972* US Open Grand Slam R16 Grass Billie Jean King 6-4 6-4 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data
Jun 30, 1972* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Billie Jean King 6-2 6-0 Sharon Walsh Pete Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Billie Jean King #22 #13 — 2,402 684 160 81.0% 9 1 0 3 59 72
Sharon Walsh Pete — — — 1,894 300 340 46.9% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Billie Jean King Sharon Walsh Pete
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1968 1–2 33.3% — 1,484 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1969 4–6 40.0% — 1,524 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1970 32–16 66.7% — 1,833 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1971 10–10 50.0% — 1,707 0 2
20 — — — — — — — 1972 32–27 54.2% — 1,729 0 3
21 — — — — — — — 1973 37–33 52.9% — 1,653 0 4
22 — — — — — — — 1974 27–19 58.7% — 1,774 0 7
23 — — — — — — — 1975 9–25 26.5% — 1,661 0 7
24 1968 40–5 88.9% — 1,823 2 6 1976 7–10 41.2% — 1,620 0 7
25 1969 58–14 80.6% — 2,043 2 11 1977 17–21 44.7% — 1,722 0 7
26 1970 47–11 81.0% — 2,172 2 16 1978 15–27 35.7% — 1,677 0 7
27 1971 114–15 88.4% — 2,293 3 33 1979 14–22 38.9% — 1,620 0 7
28 1972 89–15 85.6% — 2,341 6 43 1980 16–19 45.7% — 1,712 0 7
29 1973 56–12 82.4% — 2,294 7 50 1981 25–17 59.5% — 1,841 0 8
30 1974 54–8 87.1% — 2,300 8 56 1982 10–19 34.5% — 1,758 0 8
31 1975 23–3 88.5% — 2,370 9 58 1983 15–13 53.6% — 1,810 0 8
32 1976 2–2 50.0% — 2,316 9 58 1984 8–12 40.0% — 1,808 0 8
33 1977 46–6 88.5% — 2,386 9 64 1985 8–17 32.0% — 1,627 0 8
34 1978 28–12 70.0% — 2,301 9 64 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,602 0 8
35 1979 36–13 73.5% — 2,164 9 66 1987 11–15 42.3% — 1,598 0 8
36 1980 39–15 72.2% — 2,122 9 69 1988 0–6 0.0% — 1,507 0 8
37 1981 4–5 44.4% — 2,019 9 69 — — — — — — —
38 1982 26–19 57.8% — 1,932 9 70 — — — — — — —
39 1983 22–5 81.5% — 2,052 9 72 — — — — — — —