H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Billie Jean King vs Shirley Bloomer H2H: 1-1
Billie Jean King and Shirley Bloomer are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Billie Jean King leads 1–0 on carpet, while Shirley Bloomer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Billie Jean King won the 1971 Wembley fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 1971* | Wembley | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Billie Jean King | 6-4 6-1 | Shirley Bloomer | Match data |
| Jun 13, 1968* | Beckenham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Shirley Bloomer | (w/o) | Billie Jean King | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Billie Jean King | #22 | #13 | — | 2,402 | 684 | 160 | 81.0% | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 59 | 72 |
| Shirley Bloomer | — | — | — | 1,769 | 84 | 56 | 60.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Billie Jean King | Shirley Bloomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 40–5 | 88.9% | — | 1,823 | 2 | 6 | 1968 | 18–7 | 72.0% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 1969 | 58–14 | 80.6% | — | 2,043 | 2 | 11 | 1969 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 1970 | 47–11 | 81.0% | — | 2,172 | 2 | 16 | 1970 | 12–12 | 50.0% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 114–15 | 88.4% | — | 2,293 | 3 | 33 | 1971 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 3 |
| 1972 | 89–15 | 85.6% | — | 2,341 | 6 | 43 | 1972 | 8–6 | 57.1% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 3 |
| 1973 | 56–12 | 82.4% | — | 2,294 | 7 | 50 | 1973 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 3 |
| 1974 | 54–8 | 87.1% | — | 2,300 | 8 | 56 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 3 |
| 1975 | 23–3 | 88.5% | — | 2,370 | 9 | 58 | 1979 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,595 | 0 | 4 |
| 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 2,316 | 9 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1977 | 46–6 | 88.5% | — | 2,386 | 9 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1978 | 28–12 | 70.0% | — | 2,301 | 9 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | 36–13 | 73.5% | — | 2,164 | 9 | 66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 39–15 | 72.2% | — | 2,122 | 9 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 2,019 | 9 | 69 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 26–19 | 57.8% | — | 1,932 | 9 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 22–5 | 81.5% | — | 2,052 | 9 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |