H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Billie Jean King vs Tracy Austin H2H: 1-5

Tracy Austin holds a 5–1 lead over Billie Jean King in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tracy Austin leads 3–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Billie Jean King won the 1982 Wimbledon quarterfinal 3-6 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Billie Jean King
Age 82 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Tracy Austin
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 2, 1982* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Billie Jean King 3-6 6-4 6-2 Tracy Austin Match data
Mar 17, 1980 Avon Championships WTA Finals SF Carpet Tracy Austin 6-3 6-1 Billie Jean King Match data
Mar 15, 1980* Boston WTA 250 SF Carpet Tracy Austin 6-3 6-0 Billie Jean King Match data
Jan 12, 1980* Cincinnati WTA 1000 SF Carpet Tracy Austin 6-3 6-1 Billie Jean King Match data
Dec 15, 1979* Tokyo Emeron Cup WTA 250 SF Hard Tracy Austin 6-3 2-6 6-1 Billie Jean King Match data
Jul 6, 1979* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Tracy Austin 6-4 6-7 6-2 Billie Jean King Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Billie Jean King #22 #13 — 2,402 684 160 81.0% 9 1 0 3 59 72
Tracy Austin #81 #4 19 2,484 339 88 79.4% 2 2 1 4 19 28

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Billie Jean King Tracy Austin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1977 14–8 63.6% — 1,777 0 1
15 — — — — — — — 1978 43–13 76.8% — 2,055 0 2
16 — — — — — — — 1979 73–12 85.9% — 2,412 1 9
17 — — — — — — — 1980 81–10 89.0% — 2,383 1 19
18 — — — — — — — 1981 56–7 88.9% — 2,406 2 27
19 — — — — — — — 1982 35–12 74.5% — 2,224 2 28
20 — — — — — — — 1983 24–8 75.0% — 2,162 2 28
21 — — — — — — — 1984 2–2 50.0% #27 2,115 2 28
24 1968 40–5 88.9% — 1,823 2 6 — — — — — — —
25 1969 58–14 80.6% — 2,043 2 11 — — — — — — —
26 1970 47–11 81.0% — 2,172 2 16 1989 0–2 0.0% — 2,057 2 28
27 1971 114–15 88.4% — 2,293 3 33 — — — — — — —
28 1972 89–15 85.6% — 2,341 6 43 — — — — — — —
29 1973 56–12 82.4% — 2,294 7 50 — — — — — — —
30 1974 54–8 87.1% — 2,300 8 56 1993 6–6 50.0% #117 1,955 2 28
31 1975 23–3 88.5% — 2,370 9 58 1994 5–8 38.5% #81 1,840 2 28
32 1976 2–2 50.0% — 2,316 9 58 — — — — — — —
33 1977 46–6 88.5% — 2,386 9 64 — — — — — — —
34 1978 28–12 70.0% — 2,301 9 64 — — — — — — —
35 1979 36–13 73.5% — 2,164 9 66 — — — — — — —
36 1980 39–15 72.2% — 2,122 9 69 — — — — — — —
37 1981 4–5 44.4% — 2,019 9 69 — — — — — — —
38 1982 26–19 57.8% — 1,932 9 70 — — — — — — —
39 1983 22–5 81.5% — 2,052 9 72 — — — — — — —