Birgitte Hermansen
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jun 6, 1979 | H2H |
| Patricia Bostrom | 0 | 1 | 1 | Dec 25, 1978 | H2H |
| Beth Norton | 0 | 1 | 1 | Dec 16, 1978 | H2H |
| Mimi Wikstedt | 1 | 0 | 1 | Dec 15, 1978 | H2H |
| Rene Blount | 1 | 0 | 1 | Dec 14, 1978 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC
Birgitte Hermansen vs Lea Antonoplis H2H: 0-1
Lea Antonoplis holds a 1–0 lead over Birgitte Hermansen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lea Antonoplis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Lea Antonoplis won the 1979 Beckenham round of 64 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lea Antonoplis | 7-6 7-6 | Birgitte Hermansen | Match data | Jun 6, 1979* | R64 | Beckenham | WTA 250 | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Birgitte Hermansen | — | — | — | 1,548 | 3 | 4 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lea Antonoplis | — | #66 | 6 | 1,771 | 129 | 177 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Birgitte Hermansen | Lea Antonoplis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 8–3 | 72.7% | — | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 7–6 | 53.8% | — | 1,610 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 20–21 | 48.8% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 14–7 | 66.7% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–11 | 45.0% | — | 1,718 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #71 | 1,583 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–14 | 12.5% | #176 | 1,459 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,412 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,454 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #210 | 1,447 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 2 |
Surface Results by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Birgitte Hermansen | Lea Antonoplis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1978 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1979 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | Career | 48 | 73 | 121 | 39.7% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | 48 | 50 | 98 | 49.0% | 12 | 34 | 46 | 26.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Birgitte Hermansen | Lea Antonoplis | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1978 | 1526 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +41 | 46.2% | -0.46 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.69 | 1973 | 1579 | 109.5 | — | — | — | — | +107 | — | — | 69.6% | +0.70 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +3.55 |
| 1979 | 1518 | 103.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.00 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.06 | 1974 | 1532 | 101.9 | — | — | — | — | +96 | — | +11 | 41.2% | -0.65 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–1 | — | +1.36 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 1560 | 116.0 | — | — | — | — | +137 | — | — | 41.2% | -0.41 | 2–1 (67%) | — | — | +0.22 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1610 | 115.7 | — | — | — | — | +32 | -29 | -15 | 48.0% | -0.16 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.92 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 1653 | 115.1 | — | — | — | — | -4 | — | -31 | 62.5% | +0.67 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–1 | — | +1.95 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1722 | 133.3 | — | — | — | — | -57 | — | +32 | 50.5% | +0.05 | 11–8 (58%) | 8–6 (57%) | 104.9 | +1.83 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1727 | 130.8 | — | — | — | — | -81 | — | +4 | 47.5% | -0.54 | 5–6 (45%) | 8–4 (67%) | 101.1 | -0.98 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1734 | 123.6 | — | — | — | — | -96 | — | +60 | 63.3% | +0.80 | 4–3 (57%) | 0–3 (0%) | 98.2 | +1.54 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1719 | 116.7 | — | — | — | — | -93 | — | +93 | 43.2% | -0.91 | 3–1 (75%) | 2–2 (50%) | — | -0.94 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 1633 | 114.8 | — | — | — | — | -126 | — | +169 | 37.7% | -1.00 | 2–7 (22%) | 3–5 (38%) | 93.4 | +1.13 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1568 | 97.9 | — | — | — | — | -31 | +19 | +128 | 32.6% | -1.30 | 3–2 (60%) | — | — | +0.41 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1584 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | -39 | — | +94 | 41.9% | -0.67 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–4 (20%) | 99.4 | +2.44 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1571 | 120.2 | — | — | — | — | -36 | — | +95 | 41.3% | -0.55 | 5–5 (50%) | 6–3 (67%) | 102.7 | +2.18 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1459 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | -13 | — | +165 | 26.3% | -1.26 | 0–6 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | 90.9 | +0.87 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1412 | 91.8 | — | — | — | — | -5 | +47 | — | 34.5% | -1.00 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.6 | +1.66 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1454 | 110.8 | — | — | — | — | -65 | — | +173 | 44.1% | -0.91 | 1–5 (17%) | 2–3 (40%) | 97.2 | +0.65 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1447 | 110.4 | — | — | — | — | -12 | — | — | 33.3% | -0.58 | 2–2 (50%) | 0–2 | — | +0.77 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1431 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.21 |
| Career | 1549 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +41 | 40.0% | -0.53 | 1–0 | 0–3 (0%) | — | +9.00 | Career | 1772 | 122.0 | — | — | — | — | -33 | +2 | +75 | 44.4% | -0.47 | 45–60 (43%) | 34–41 (45%) | 95.8 | +6.50 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Lea Antonoplis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wendy Turnbull | 0 | 5 | 5 | Nov 26, 1981 | H2H |
| Helena Sukova | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 22, 1989 | H2H |
| Rosalyn Fairbank | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jul 16, 1988 | H2H |
| Vicki Nelson | 2 | 2 | 4 | Oct 27, 1987 | H2H |
| Pam Shriver | 1 | 3 | 4 | Jul 20, 1985 | H2H |