H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 4-1

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 4–1 lead over Alexia Dechaume Balleret in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1997 Prague round of 16 3-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main-draw meetings
Alexia Dechaume Balleret
FRA Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alexia Dechaume Balleret 3-6 6-2 6-1 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #14 Match data Jul 18, 1997* R16 Prague Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #10 6-4 6-4 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data May 29, 1996* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #33 6-2 2-6 6-2 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data Mar 5, 1992* R32 Boca Raton Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #44 7-6 6-2 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data Aug 25, 1991* F Schenectady Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #40 6-2 3-6 6-3 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data Mar 15, 1989* R64 Boca Raton WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 298 222 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Alexia Dechaume Balleret — — — 1,738 127 181 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Alexia Dechaume Balleret
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0 1986 1–1 50.0% — 1,516 0 0
17 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,675 0 0 1987 6–10 37.5% — 1,539 0 0
18 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,599 0 0 1988 7–13 35.0% — 1,532 0 0
19 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,676 0 0 1989 5–14 26.3% — 1,491 0 0
20 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1 1990 13–11 54.2% — 1,600 0 0
21 1992 31–21 59.6% #33 1,822 0 2 1991 14–18 43.8% — 1,645 0 0
22 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,791 0 3 1992 21–19 52.5% — 1,733 0 0
23 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,886 0 3 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,710 0 0
24 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,971 0 5 1994 12–13 48.0% — 1,704 0 0
25 1996 37–19 66.1% #12 1,910 0 6 1995 6–15 28.6% — 1,585 0 0
26 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,856 0 7 1996 7–13 35.0% — 1,576 0 0
27 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,674 0 7 1997 15–15 50.0% — 1,620 0 0
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,652 0 7 1998 9–19 32.1% — 1,592 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1999 11–18 37.9% — 1,571 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0
35 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Alexia Dechaume Balleret
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 1987 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
18 1989 10 7 17 58.8% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
19 1990 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1992 11 8 19 57.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1991 10 11 21 47.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 1993 6 8 14 42.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1992 12 11 23 52.2% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1994 13 6 19 68.4% 18 7 25 72.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 20 6 26 76.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1994 7 8 15 46.7% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1996 18 8 26 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1997 6 9 15 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1997 9 8 17 52.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 3 9 12 25.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 115 88 203 56.7% 79 57 136 58.1% 48 28 76 63.2% 56 49 105 53.3% — 59 86 145 40.7% 51 67 118 43.2% 10 16 26 38.5% 7 12 19 36.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Alexia Dechaume Balleret
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1491 102.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 1516 114.3 — — — — +14 +66 — 44.4% +0.59 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 99.6 +0.98 1986 1517 105.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% 0.00 — — — +0.01
17 1988 1676 132.1 — — — — -3 -46 -109 50.0% -0.12 7–5 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 105.0 +1.87 1987 1539 124.4 — — — — +28 +26 — 42.1% 0.00 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — +1.23
18 1989 1600 127.5 — — — — +72 -49 -48 42.7% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 96.4 +0.98 1988 1532 116.8 — — — — — +56 +5 40.0% -1.02 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — +0.04
19 1990 1676 128.3 — — — — +2 -134 -49 51.9% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 5–8 (38%) 95.5 +0.09 1989 1492 117.1 — — — — -9 +59 — 36.4% -1.11 0–6 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 92.8 +0.68
20 1991 1799 143.8 — — — — -69 -241 +12 54.0% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 10–4 (71%) 109.5 -1.70 1990 1601 116.0 — — — — -64 -22 -5 51.7% -0.12 6–4 (60%) 6–1 (86%) 108.0 +1.41
21 1992 1823 148.5 — — — — -54 -53 +64 55.6% +0.34 14–10 (58%) 9–7 (56%) 105.5 -0.55 1991 1645 125.3 — — — — -25 -89 -62 49.3% +0.04 1–8 (11%) 1–1 — -0.53
22 1993 1792 145.4 — — — — -104 +99 +125 57.4% +0.44 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -1.23 1992 1733 139.7 — — — — -43 -63 — 52.2% +0.31 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 101.1 -0.96
23 1994 1886 147.7 — — — — -40 +53 -14 62.7% +0.70 11–3 (79%) 11–7 (61%) 112.3 +0.33 1993 1710 99.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — 0.00
24 1995 1971 149.3 — — — — +20 -90 -60 64.5% +0.82 15–4 (79%) 13–12 (52%) 104.4 +1.45 1994 1705 133.1 — — — — -51 +24 — 51.9% +0.11 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.41
25 1996 1911 151.8 — — — — +44 -26 +47 60.6% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–12 (52%) 99.9 +1.96 1995 1585 113.1 — — — — +35 +34 — 22.5% -1.58 1–1 0–2 — -0.50
26 1997 1856 146.3 — — — — -5 +2 +142 57.7% +0.51 11–9 (55%) 11–5 (69%) 100.3 -0.20 1996 1576 120.4 — — — — +9 +78 — 35.7% -1.19 1–3 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 100.2 -0.64
27 1998 1675 104.7 — — — — +65 +68 — 39.1% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +1.05 1997 1621 127.1 — — — — +3 +66 — 52.8% -0.01 4–8 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.3 +0.82
28 1999 1653 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18 1998 1592 121.9 — — — — -25 +71 +3 36.8% -0.87 5–7 (42%) 3–5 (38%) 98.4 -1.11
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1572 115.6 — — — — +3 +13 +1 40.9% -0.94 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) 98.3 -0.59
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1556 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.12
35 2006 1642 101.1 -1.73 -1.74 0.650 43.0% — — +401 36.4% -0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 1614 101.2 -1.59 -2.16 0.779 45.4% +53 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–2 — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 1592 96.8 +1.39 -2.63 0.741 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 147.4 -1.20 -2.11 0.735 44.6% -6 -3 +29 55.4% +0.29 100–69 (59%) 96–80 (55%) 105.7 +0.96 — 1739 130.0 — — — — -16 +20 -8 44.0% -0.45 32–62 (34%) 28–29 (49%) 94.0 +0.13

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.