H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 4-1

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 4–1 lead over Alexia Dechaume Balleret in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 3–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1997 Prague fourth round 3-6 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Alexia Dechaume Balleret
Age 56 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 18, 1997* Prague WTA 250 R16 Clay Alexia Dechaume Balleret 3-6 6-2 6-1 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #14 Match data
May 29, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #10 6-4 6-4 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data
Mar 5, 1992* Boca Raton WTA 1000 R32 Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #33 6-2 2-6 6-2 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data
Aug 25, 1991* Schenectady WTA 250 F Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #44 7-6 6-2 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data
Mar 15, 1989* Boca Raton WTA 250 R64 Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #40 6-2 3-6 6-3 Alexia Dechaume Balleret Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Alexia Dechaume Balleret — — — 1,739 127 181 41.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Alexia Dechaume Balleret
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0 1986 1–1 50.0% — 1,516 0 0
17 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0 1987 6–10 37.5% — 1,538 0 0
18 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0 1988 7–13 35.0% — 1,532 0 0
19 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0 1989 5–14 26.3% — 1,494 0 0
20 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1 1990 13–11 54.2% — 1,602 0 0
21 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2 1991 14–18 43.8% — 1,646 0 0
22 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3 1992 21–19 52.5% — 1,732 0 0
23 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3 1993 0–1 0.0% — 1,709 0 0
24 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5 1994 12–13 48.0% — 1,704 0 0
25 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6 1995 6–15 28.6% — 1,585 0 0
26 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7 1996 7–13 35.0% — 1,577 0 0
27 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7 1997 15–15 50.0% — 1,621 0 0
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7 1998 9–19 32.1% — 1,593 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 1999 11–18 37.9% — 1,572 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2000 0–1 0.0% — 1,555 0 0
35 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7 — — — — — — —