H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Betsy Nagelsen H2H: 2-0

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 2–0 lead over Betsy Nagelsen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1990 Wimbledon third round 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Betsy Nagelsen
USA Age 69 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 1, 1990* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #65 6-1 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen #83 Match data
Apr 16, 1988* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 R16 Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #54 7-6 6-4 Betsy Nagelsen #108 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Betsy Nagelsen #692 #25 28 1,885 266 324 45.1% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Betsy Nagelsen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 1972 4–2 66.7% — 1,537 0 1
16 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,517 0 1
17 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0 1974 27–18 60.0% — 1,730 0 3
18 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0 1975 18–17 51.4% — 1,793 0 3
19 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0 1976 11–19 36.7% — 1,709 0 3
20 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1 1977 8–15 34.8% — 1,677 0 3
21 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2 1978 13–24 35.1% — 1,659 0 3
22 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3 1979 18–19 48.6% — 1,695 0 5
23 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3 1980 22–27 44.9% — 1,756 0 5
24 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5 1981 20–21 48.8% — 1,803 0 6
25 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6 1982 12–17 41.4% — 1,704 0 6
26 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7 1983 18–22 45.0% — 1,692 0 6
27 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7 1984 11–18 37.9% #77 1,630 0 6
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7 1985 14–12 53.8% #81 1,714 0 6
29 — — — — — — — 1986 18–17 51.4% #46 1,699 0 6
30 — — — — — — — 1987 13–15 46.4% #61 1,645 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1988 11–19 36.7% #109 1,586 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1989 18–15 54.5% #45 1,663 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1990 8–12 40.0% #96 1,640 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1991 0–2 0.0% #337 1,608 0 6
35 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7 1992 1–5 16.7% #418 1,561 0 6
36 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7 1993 0–4 0.0% #394 1,512 0 6
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7 1994 0–1 0.0% #692 1,510 0 6