H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Beverly Bowes H2H: 0-1

Beverly Bowes holds a 1–0 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Beverly Bowes leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Beverly Bowes won the 1989 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-1 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Beverly Bowes
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Beverly Bowes #76 6-1 7-6 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #40 Match data Mar 21, 1989* R128 Key Biscayne WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 298 222 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Beverly Bowes #597 #49 16 1,676 69 120 36.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Beverly Bowes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,675 0 0 1983 3–6 33.3% — 1,526 0 0
18 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,599 0 0 1984 1–5 16.7% #161 1,482 0 0
19 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,676 0 0 1985 6–6 50.0% #170 1,526 0 0
20 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1 1986 6–8 42.9% #100 1,585 0 0
21 1992 31–21 59.6% #33 1,822 0 2 1987 7–18 28.0% #75 1,590 0 0
22 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,791 0 3 1988 14–19 42.4% #62 1,639 0 0
23 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,886 0 3 1989 13–19 40.6% #101 1,618 0 0
24 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,971 0 5 1990 5–13 27.8% #147 1,536 0 0
25 1996 37–19 66.1% #12 1,910 0 6 1991 2–5 28.6% #156 1,520 0 0
26 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,856 0 7 1992 3–8 27.3% #113 1,510 0 0
27 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,674 0 7 1993 8–11 42.1% #130 1,551 0 0
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,652 0 7 1994 1–2 33.3% #426 1,557 0 0
35 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Beverly Bowes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 1983 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1989 10 7 17 58.8% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1990 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1986 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1992 11 8 19 57.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1987 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
22 1993 6 8 14 42.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 11 13 24 45.8% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 1994 13 6 19 68.4% 18 7 25 72.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1989 12 13 25 48.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 20 6 26 76.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1990 3 8 11 27.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — —
25 1996 18 8 26 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1997 6 9 15 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 1992 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 115 88 203 56.7% 79 57 136 58.1% 48 28 76 63.2% 56 49 105 53.3% — 44 66 110 40.0% 19 33 52 36.5% 1 11 12 8.3% 2 8 10 20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Beverly Bowes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1491 102.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 1516 114.3 — — — — +14 +66 — 44.4% +0.59 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 99.6 +0.98 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1988 1676 132.1 — — — — -3 -46 -109 50.0% -0.12 7–5 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 105.0 +1.87 1983 1527 109.4 — — — — — +94 — 36.4% -1.36 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.4 -0.02
18 1989 1600 127.5 — — — — +72 -49 -48 42.7% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 96.4 +0.98 1984 1483 102.6 — — — — +16 — — 28.6% -1.50 0–2 — — +0.56
19 1990 1676 128.3 — — — — +2 -134 -49 51.9% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 5–8 (38%) 95.5 +0.09 1985 1526 113.9 — — — — -36 +84 — 50.0% +0.12 1–1 1–1 — +0.37
20 1991 1799 143.8 — — — — -69 -241 +12 54.0% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 10–4 (71%) 109.5 -1.70 1986 1585 113.1 — — — — -13 — — 44.8% -0.52 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.61
21 1992 1823 148.5 — — — — -54 -53 +64 55.6% +0.34 14–10 (58%) 9–7 (56%) 105.5 -0.55 1987 1590 126.7 — — — — -36 +54 -102 32.1% -1.34 4–4 (50%) 0–4 (0%) 99.5 -1.69
22 1993 1792 145.4 — — — — -104 +99 +125 57.4% +0.44 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -1.23 1988 1640 128.2 — — — — -42 -20 — 44.4% -0.44 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 -0.80
23 1994 1886 147.7 — — — — -40 +53 -14 62.7% +0.70 11–3 (79%) 11–7 (61%) 112.3 +0.33 1989 1618 121.7 — — — — +15 -8 — 43.6% -0.61 6–8 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 97.1 +0.13
24 1995 1971 149.3 — — — — +20 -90 -60 64.5% +0.82 15–4 (79%) 13–12 (52%) 104.4 +1.45 1990 1537 112.4 — — — — +27 +14 — 34.8% -0.67 4–6 (40%) 2–5 (29%) 95.7 +0.22
25 1996 1911 151.8 — — — — +44 -26 +47 60.6% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–12 (52%) 99.9 +1.96 1991 1521 98.6 — — — — +25 -2 — 35.3% -1.35 1–2 (33%) — — +0.30
26 1997 1856 146.3 — — — — -5 +2 +142 57.7% +0.51 11–9 (55%) 11–5 (69%) 100.3 -0.20 1992 1511 111.3 — — — — +22 +24 — 32.0% -1.16 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.14
27 1998 1675 104.7 — — — — +65 +68 — 39.1% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +1.05 1993 1552 118.8 — — — — +24 -12 — 42.9% -0.50 2–2 (50%) — — +0.50
28 1999 1653 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18 1994 1558 112.1 — — — — +22 — — 28.6% -2.43 1–0 — — -0.33
35 2006 1642 101.1 -1.73 -1.74 0.650 43.0% — — +401 36.4% -0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 1614 101.2 -1.59 -2.16 0.779 45.4% +53 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–2 — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 1592 96.8 +1.39 -2.63 0.741 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 147.4 -1.20 -2.11 0.735 44.6% -6 -3 +29 55.4% +0.29 100–69 (59%) 96–80 (55%) 105.7 +0.96 — 1677 124.6 — — — — -4 +21 -102 39.6% -0.78 26–34 (43%) 8–18 (31%) 93.9 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.