H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Camille Benjamin H2H: 1-0

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 1–0 lead over Camille Benjamin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1988 Oklahoma round of 16 7-6 4-6 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Camille Benjamin
USA Age 60 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #103 7-6 4-6 6-2 Camille Benjamin #100 Match data Feb 26, 1988* R16 Oklahoma WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 298 222 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Camille Benjamin #1,000 #27 13 1,820 177 223 44.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Camille Benjamin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0 1982 21–14 60.0% — 1,689 0 0
17 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,675 0 0 1983 22–25 46.8% — 1,715 0 0
18 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,599 0 0 1984 28–27 50.9% #33 1,767 0 0
19 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,676 0 0 1985 22–29 43.1% #62 1,628 0 0
20 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1 1986 19–26 42.2% #79 1,608 0 0
21 1992 31–21 59.6% #33 1,822 0 2 1987 23–24 48.9% #67 1,654 0 0
22 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,791 0 3 1988 14–23 37.8% #91 1,600 0 0
23 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,886 0 3 1989 14–20 41.2% #92 1,651 0 0
24 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,971 0 5 1990 10–18 35.7% #136 1,620 0 0
25 1996 37–19 66.1% #12 1,910 0 6 1991 2–8 20.0% #225 1,559 0 0
26 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,856 0 7 1992 1–5 16.7% #251 1,527 0 0
27 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,674 0 7 1993 1–3 25.0% #276 1,516 0 0
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,652 0 7 1994 0–1 0.0% #251 1,503 0 0
35 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Camille Benjamin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1986 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 14 8 22 63.6% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
17 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 1983 7 10 17 41.2% 8 7 15 53.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1989 10 7 17 58.8% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1984 10 9 19 52.6% 11 8 19 57.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
19 1990 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1985 14 12 26 53.8% 2 7 9 22.2% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 6 9 33.3%
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1986 10 10 20 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
21 1992 11 8 19 57.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1987 12 9 21 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1993 6 8 14 42.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 10 14 24 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1994 13 6 19 68.4% 18 7 25 72.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1989 10 12 22 45.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1995 20 6 26 76.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1990 5 10 15 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 18 8 26 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1991 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
26 1997 6 9 15 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 1992 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1993 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
28 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
35 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 115 88 203 56.7% 79 57 136 58.1% 48 28 76 63.2% 56 49 105 53.3% — 95 106 201 47.3% 41 51 92 44.6% 24 37 61 39.3% 12 27 39 30.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Camille Benjamin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1986 1491 102.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1987 1516 114.3 — — — — +14 +66 — 44.4% +0.59 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 99.6 +0.98 1982 1690 123.4 — — — — +57 — -145 54.9% +0.38 9–5 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 105.6 +0.11
17 1988 1676 132.1 — — — — -3 -46 -109 50.0% -0.12 7–5 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 105.0 +1.87 1983 1715 124.3 — — — — -16 -37 -116 45.0% -0.65 11–8 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 107.6 -1.37
18 1989 1600 127.5 — — — — +72 -49 -48 42.7% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 96.4 +0.98 1984 1767 138.8 — — — — -53 -4 -96 49.6% +0.05 9–10 (47%) 7–8 (47%) 100.2 -4.27
19 1990 1676 128.3 — — — — +2 -134 -49 51.9% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 5–8 (38%) 95.5 +0.09 1985 1629 116.8 — — — — +24 +2 +11 44.6% -0.60 4–8 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 102.2 +2.47
20 1991 1799 143.8 — — — — -69 -241 +12 54.0% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 10–4 (71%) 109.5 -1.70 1986 1608 118.6 — — — — -3 +36 +20 43.4% -0.36 8–8 (50%) 4–11 (27%) 96.1 +1.65
21 1992 1823 148.5 — — — — -54 -53 +64 55.6% +0.34 14–10 (58%) 9–7 (56%) 105.5 -0.55 1987 1654 128.3 — — — — -3 -8 +7 46.8% -0.24 13–6 (68%) 3–5 (38%) 107.2 +0.06
22 1993 1792 145.4 — — — — -104 +99 +125 57.4% +0.44 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -1.23 1988 1600 120.9 — — — — -4 +28 +19 41.7% -0.76 5–7 (42%) 4–4 (50%) 98.5 +0.02
23 1994 1886 147.7 — — — — -40 +53 -14 62.7% +0.70 11–3 (79%) 11–7 (61%) 112.3 +0.33 1989 1652 128.9 — — — — +3 -23 -85 43.9% -0.34 6–8 (43%) 1–8 (11%) 92.9 -1.55
24 1995 1971 149.3 — — — — +20 -90 -60 64.5% +0.82 15–4 (79%) 13–12 (52%) 104.4 +1.45 1990 1620 116.6 — — — — -24 +20 -56 32.2% -1.46 4–1 (80%) 4–4 (50%) 103.5 -1.55
25 1996 1911 151.8 — — — — +44 -26 +47 60.6% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–12 (52%) 99.9 +1.96 1991 1559 107.1 — — — — -30 +86 — 28.6% -1.90 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18
26 1997 1856 146.3 — — — — -5 +2 +142 57.7% +0.51 11–9 (55%) 11–5 (69%) 100.3 -0.20 1992 1527 113.1 — — — — -18 — — 23.1% -2.54 0–1 0–1 — -0.34
27 1998 1675 104.7 — — — — +65 +68 — 39.1% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +1.05 1993 1516 101.5 — — — — -9 — — 25.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — +0.04
28 1999 1653 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18 1994 1503 100.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.11
35 2006 1642 101.1 -1.73 -1.74 0.650 43.0% — — +401 36.4% -0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 1614 101.2 -1.59 -2.16 0.779 45.4% +53 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–2 — -0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 1592 96.8 +1.39 -2.63 0.741 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2025 147.4 -1.20 -2.11 0.735 44.6% -6 -3 +29 55.4% +0.29 100–69 (59%) 96–80 (55%) 105.7 +0.96 — 1821 128.3 — — — — -1 +2 -49 44.3% -0.48 70–64 (52%) 46–54 (46%) 102.4 -1.21

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.