H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 2-0
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 2–0 lead over Catarina Lindqvist Ryan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1991 Chicago third round 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 1991* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 7-6 6-3 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Apr 15, 1988* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 1-6 6-1 6-3 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | #919 | #9 | 1,672 | 2,025 | 295 | 220 | 57.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #149 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #83 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #43 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1991 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #30 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1992 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #40 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1994 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1995 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1996 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1997 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1998 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #188 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #893 | 1,651 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,642 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,614 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,592 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |