H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Claudia Kohde Kilsch H2H: 1-1
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy and Claudia Kohde Kilsch are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Claudia Kohde Kilsch leads 1–0 on carpet, while Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Claudia Kohde Kilsch won the 1991 Zurich third round 7-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Age 62
Right-Handed
187 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 1991* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | 7-6 6-2 | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1991* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 6-4 6-1 | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | #919 | #9 | 1,672 | 2,025 | 295 | 220 | 57.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Claudia Kohde Kilsch | #387 | #4 | 77 | 2,157 | 401 | 233 | 63.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Claudia Kohde Kilsch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #149 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 36–18 | 66.7% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 40–22 | 64.5% | — | 1,841 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1989 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #83 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #43 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 29–20 | 59.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1991 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #30 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 42–16 | 72.4% | #8 | 2,014 | 0 | 9 |
| 21 | 1992 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #5 | 2,115 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #40 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #7 | 2,049 | 0 | 10 |
| 23 | 1994 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 35–16 | 68.6% | #10 | 1,994 | 0 | 10 |
| 24 | 1995 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 39–18 | 68.4% | #12 | 1,952 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 1996 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #37 | 1,856 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1990 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #46 | 1,792 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #188 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #85 | 1,682 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #893 | 1,651 | 0 | 7 | 1992 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #78 | 1,647 | 0 | 12 |
| 35 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,642 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,614 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,592 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |