H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Debbie Graham H2H: 3-1
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 3–1 lead over Debbie Graham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1995 Chicago fourth round 6-4 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 10, 1995* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 6-4 7-6 | Debbie Graham | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1993* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Debbie Graham | 7-5 6-3 | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Match data |
| Jun 16, 1993* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 6-2 7-5 | Debbie Graham | Match data |
| May 3, 1993* | Taranto | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 7-6 6-2 | Debbie Graham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | #919 | #9 | 1,672 | 2,025 | 295 | 220 | 57.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Debbie Graham | #729 | #35 | 190 | 1,756 | 83 | 90 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Debbie Graham | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #149 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #138 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #83 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #256 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #43 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #121 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #30 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #42 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #51 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #40 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #65 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #68 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #131 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #122 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #188 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #893 | 1,651 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,642 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,614 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,592 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |