H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Emanuela Zardo H2H: 0-1
Emanuela Zardo holds a 1–0 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Emanuela Zardo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Emanuela Zardo won the 1993 Palermo fourth round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 56
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 1993* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Emanuela Zardo | 6-4 6-2 | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | #919 | #9 | 1,672 | 2,025 | 295 | 220 | 57.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Emanuela Zardo | #976 | #27 | 80 | 1,765 | 69 | 74 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Emanuela Zardo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #149 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #83 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #43 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #30 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #63 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #31 | 1,714 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #40 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #39 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #89 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #188 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #893 | 1,651 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,642 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,614 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,592 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |