H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 1-0

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 1–0 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1990 Brisbane International round of 16 7-5 6-1.

NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #83 7-5 6-1 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Jan 5, 1990* R16 Brisbane International Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy — #9 1,672 2,025 298 222 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — #9 — 2,083 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,803 0 2
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,873 0 2
16 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,845 0 2
17 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,676 0 0 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,851 0 2
18 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,599 0 0 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,976 0 3
19 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,676 0 0 1986 34–16 68.0% #9 1,975 0 4
20 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,903 0 4
21 1992 31–21 59.6% #33 1,822 0 2 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,813 0 4
22 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,791 0 3 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,788 0 4
23 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,886 0 3 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,697 0 4
24 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,971 0 5 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,589 0 4
25 1996 37–19 66.1% #12 1,910 0 6 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4
26 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,856 0 7 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,628 0 4
27 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,674 0 7 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,585 0 4
28 1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,653 0 7 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,609 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,555 0 4
35 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,615 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
15 1986 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
16 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 8 5 13 61.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
17 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 1984 6 3 9 66.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
18 1989 10 7 17 58.8% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1985 15 5 20 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
19 1990 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1986 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 6 21 71.4%
20 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1992 11 8 19 57.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1993 6 8 14 42.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1989 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
23 1994 13 6 19 68.4% 18 7 25 72.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1995 20 6 26 76.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1991 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 1996 18 8 26 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1992 5 8 13 38.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1997 6 9 15 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
35 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 115 88 203 56.7% 79 57 136 58.1% 48 28 76 63.2% 56 49 105 53.3% — 99 84 183 54.1% 98 59 157 62.4% 27 24 51 52.9% 49 43 92 53.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1505 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.1% -0.42 1–0 1–1 — -0.02
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1804 135.2 — — — — -9 -131 -222 61.5% +1.17 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +2.43
15 1986 1491 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.08 1982 1873 149.1 — — — — -69 -6 -216 60.4% +0.54 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 107.8 -3.09
16 1987 1516 114.4 — — — — +14 +66 — 44.4% +0.59 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 99.6 +1.12 1983 1846 139.3 — — — — -46 +102 -186 58.6% +0.96 12–7 (63%) 1–7 (13%) 99.3 +2.67
17 1988 1676 132.1 — — — — -2 -46 -108 50.0% -0.12 7–5 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 105.0 +1.95 1984 1852 137.3 — — — — -38 +58 -144 55.9% +0.22 9–5 (64%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.53
18 1989 1600 127.6 — — — — +72 -49 -48 42.7% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 96.4 +0.98 1985 1977 159.0 — — — — -30 -57 -101 70.6% +1.53 9–2 (82%) 3–5 (38%) 105.7 -3.00
19 1990 1677 128.3 — — — — +1 -135 -50 51.9% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 5–8 (38%) 95.5 +0.09 1986 1975 158.0 — — — — -2 +51 — 63.6% +1.08 8–6 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 -3.48
20 1991 1800 143.8 — — — — -69 -242 +11 54.0% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 10–4 (71%) 109.5 -1.70 1987 1904 131.1 — — — — +36 +49 — 61.4% +0.60 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 100.1 +0.21
21 1992 1823 148.5 — — — — -54 -53 +64 55.6% +0.34 14–10 (58%) 9–7 (56%) 105.5 -0.55 1988 1813 123.2 — — — — +53 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -1.28
22 1993 1792 145.4 — — — — -103 +99 +125 57.4% +0.44 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -1.23 1989 1789 141.3 — — — — +18 +110 -21 50.0% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 -4.18
23 1994 1886 147.7 — — — — -40 +53 -14 62.7% +0.70 11–3 (79%) 11–7 (61%) 112.3 +0.33 1990 1698 132.3 — — — — +66 +103 — 44.7% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.06
24 1995 1971 149.4 — — — — +20 -90 -60 64.5% +0.82 15–4 (79%) 13–12 (52%) 104.4 +1.45 1991 1590 119.8 — — — — +56 +172 — 36.7% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–5 (0%) 93.8 +0.93
25 1996 1911 151.8 — — — — +45 -26 +47 60.6% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–12 (52%) 99.9 +1.96 1992 1586 115.3 — — — — -4 +158 +154 45.2% -0.50 4–8 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 92.9 +1.34
26 1997 1856 146.3 — — — — -5 +2 +142 57.7% +0.51 11–9 (55%) 11–5 (69%) 100.3 -0.20 1993 1629 119.3 — — — — -56 +111 — 45.9% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 101.8 +0.90
27 1998 1675 104.7 — — — — +65 +68 — 39.1% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +1.05 1994 1586 107.2 — — — — -57 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 — — -0.20
28 1999 1653 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18 1995 1609 114.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.56
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1555 105.6 — — — — -33 +118 +211 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 +0.42
35 2006 1642 101.1 -1.73 -1.74 0.650 43.0% — — +401 36.4% -0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2007 1616 101.8 -1.59 -2.16 0.779 45.4% +51 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–2 — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2008 1593 96.5 +1.39 -2.63 0.741 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2026 147.5 -1.20 -2.11 0.735 44.6% -6 -3 +29 55.4% +0.29 100–69 (59%) 96–80 (55%) 105.7 +1.00 — 2083 146.0 — — — — -6 +45 -86 55.0% +0.38 95–63 (60%) 41–44 (48%) 102.1 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.