H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 4-3

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 4–3 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 3–1 on grass, while Larisa Savchenko leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1996 Rosmalen fourth round 6-4 6-7 6-1.

NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 3
7 main draw meetings
URS 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 21, 1996* Rosmalen WTA 250 R16 Grass Larisa Savchenko #78 6-4 6-7 6-1 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #12 Match data
Jun 15, 1996* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #12 6-2 7-6 Larisa Savchenko #84 Match data
Jun 30, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #16 6-2 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #35 Match data
May 31, 1995* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #16 1-6 6-3 6-4 Larisa Savchenko #39 Match data
Jun 13, 1992* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #29 7-6 7-6 Larisa Savchenko #51 Match data
Mar 6, 1991* Boca Raton WTA 1000 R64 Hard Larisa Savchenko #59 7-5 3-6 6-3 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #83 Match data
Nov 9, 1989* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Larisa Savchenko #32 4-6 7-5 6-2 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #83 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Larisa Savchenko #305 #13 454 1,926 238 239 49.9% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Larisa Savchenko
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1986 0–1 0.0% 1,490 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,497 0 0
1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0 1984 2–4 33.3% #138 1,507 0 0
1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0 1985 15–17 46.9% #55 1,683 0 0
1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0 1986 19–16 54.3% #36 1,755 0 0
1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0 1987 23–14 62.2% #24 1,792 0 0
1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1 1988 26–16 61.9% #16 1,861 0 0
1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2 1989 24–16 60.0% #20 1,887 0 0
1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3 1990 13–18 41.9% #91 1,715 0 0
1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3 1991 19–16 54.3% #48 1,702 0 1
1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5 1992 18–18 50.0% #58 1,728 0 1
1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6 1993 20–17 54.1% #33 1,755 0 2
1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7 1994 19–20 48.7% #41 1,809 0 2
1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7 1995 11–20 35.5% #99 1,651 0 2
1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7 1996 11–14 44.0% #61 1,669 0 2
2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7 1997 8–14 36.4% #87 1,622 0 2
2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7 1998 8–10 44.4% #73 1,654 0 2
2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7 1999 2–8 20.0% #210 1,586 0 2