H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 1-4

Lori Mcneil holds a 4–1 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Lori Mcneil leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1996 Chicago third round 7-6 6-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 31, 1996* Chicago WTA 250 R32 Carpet Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #11 7-6 6-7 6-4 Lori Mcneil #41 Match data
Jun 11, 1994* Birmingham WTA 250 SF Grass Lori Mcneil #20 3-6 7-5 6-2 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #27 Match data
Jan 8, 1992* Sydney WTA 500 R64 Hard Lori Mcneil #20 3-6 6-3 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #30 Match data
Oct 25, 1991* Brighton WTA 250 R32 Carpet Lori Mcneil #20 6-4 6-3 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #31 Match data
Feb 28, 1988* Oklahoma WTA 250 F Hard Lori Mcneil #11 6-3 6-2 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #103 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,032 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 0 11 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,569 0 1
20 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,609 0 1
21 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,017 0 3
24 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,904 0 5
25 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,696 0 6
27 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,726 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,655 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,717 0 11
35 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,669 0 11
36 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7 — — — — — — —