H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Maja Zivec Skulj H2H: 3-0
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 3–0 lead over Maja Zivec Skulj in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1994 Quebec City third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
Age 52
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 1994* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 6-2 6-3 | Maja Zivec Skulj | Match data |
| Mar 4, 1993* | Delray Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 3-6 6-3 7-6 | Maja Zivec Skulj | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1992* | Palermo | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | Maja Zivec Skulj | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | #919 | #9 | 1,672 | 2,025 | 295 | 220 | 57.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Maja Zivec Skulj | — | — | — | 1,500 | 11 | 30 | 26.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Maja Zivec Skulj | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #149 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1988 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #83 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #43 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #30 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #40 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1995 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1996 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1997 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #188 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #893 | 1,651 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,642 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,614 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,592 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |