H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 2-1

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 2–1 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1994 Roland Garros round of 64 6-4 7-6(9).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
USA

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #25 6-4 7-6(9) Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data May 26, 1994* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #30 6-3 4-6 6-4 Marianne Werdel Witmeyer Match data Sep 2, 1992* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer 6-4 7-6 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #54 Match data Apr 17, 1988* QF Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy — #9 1,672 2,025 298 222 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer — — — 1,850 181 203 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,492 0 0
1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,676 0 0 1985 6–3 66.7% — 1,541 0 1
1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,599 0 0 1986 13–10 56.5% — 1,683 0 1
1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,676 0 0 1987 10–17 37.0% — 1,659 0 1
1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1 1988 11–20 35.5% — 1,587 0 1
1992 31–21 59.6% #33 1,822 0 2 1989 13–17 43.3% — 1,592 0 1
1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,791 0 3 1990 18–18 50.0% — 1,745 0 1
1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,886 0 3 1991 21–19 52.5% — 1,739 0 1
1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,971 0 5 1992 13–17 43.3% — 1,697 0 1
1996 37–19 66.1% #12 1,910 0 6 1993 21–18 53.8% — 1,748 0 1
1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,856 0 7 1994 22–22 50.0% — 1,773 0 1
1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,674 0 7 1995 20–18 52.6% — 1,787 0 1
1999 0–1 0.0% — 1,653 0 7 1996 8–18 30.8% — 1,665 0 1
2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7 1997 5–4 55.6% — 1,673 0 1
2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,615 0 7 — — — — — — —
2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1986 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1987 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
1988 8 7 15 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% 1985 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
1989 10 7 17 58.8% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 1986 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
1990 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 1987 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 5 11 54.5%
1991 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1988 9 16 25 36.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
1992 11 8 19 57.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 5 6 16.7% 1989 11 14 25 44.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
1993 6 8 14 42.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 1990 14 12 26 53.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
1994 13 6 19 68.4% 18 7 25 72.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 1991 16 11 27 59.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
1995 20 6 26 76.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
1996 18 8 26 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 1993 14 10 24 58.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
1997 6 9 15 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 12 7 19 63.2% 1994 15 13 28 53.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
1998 2 5 7 28.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — — 1995 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 2 6 66.7%
1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 3 10 13 23.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1997 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 115 88 203 56.7% 79 57 136 58.1% 48 28 76 63.2% 56 49 105 53.3% Career 125 129 254 49.2% 7 20 27 25.9% 11 20 31 35.5% 33 33 66 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Marianne Werdel Witmeyer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1986 1491 102.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.08 1983 1492 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.03
1987 1516 114.4 — — — — +14 +66 — 44.4% +0.59 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 99.6 +1.12 1984 1478 96.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.29
1988 1676 132.1 — — — — -2 -46 -108 50.0% -0.12 7–5 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 105.0 +1.95 1985 1542 112.3 — — — — +15 — — 63.2% +0.89 1–0 0–1 — +0.37
1989 1600 127.6 — — — — +72 -49 -48 42.7% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 96.4 +0.98 1986 1683 123.2 — — — — +21 — — 50.0% -0.34 8–2 (80%) 5–1 (83%) — +1.22
1990 1677 128.3 — — — — +1 -135 -50 51.9% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 5–8 (38%) 95.5 +0.09 1987 1659 129.2 — — — — +44 — -84 41.9% -0.77 2–6 (25%) 3–0 (100%) — -0.84
1991 1800 143.8 — — — — -69 -242 +11 54.0% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 10–4 (71%) 109.5 -1.70 1988 1587 119.6 — — — — +2 — -36 37.3% -1.03 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.4 -1.09
1992 1823 148.5 — — — — -54 -53 +64 55.6% +0.34 14–10 (58%) 9–7 (56%) 105.5 -0.55 1989 1593 120.0 — — — — -7 — — 44.1% -0.25 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.6 +2.29
1993 1792 145.4 — — — — -103 +99 +125 57.4% +0.44 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -1.23 1990 1746 136.4 — — — — +8 -257 — 51.7% +0.10 7–10 (41%) 6–4 (60%) 103.1 -0.70
1994 1886 147.7 — — — — -40 +53 -14 62.7% +0.70 11–3 (79%) 11–7 (61%) 112.3 +0.33 1991 1740 132.5 — — — — +15 -243 -169 48.9% -0.13 10–4 (71%) 5–4 (56%) 103.3 +0.98
1995 1971 149.4 — — — — +20 -90 -60 64.5% +0.82 15–4 (79%) 13–12 (52%) 104.4 +1.45 1992 1698 133.4 — — — — +32 — -147 48.5% 0.00 3–7 (30%) 4–1 (80%) 98.1 +0.32
1996 1911 151.8 — — — — +45 -26 +47 60.6% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–12 (52%) 99.9 +1.96 1993 1749 139.9 — — — — +27 -270 -150 51.6% +0.31 8–5 (62%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 -0.37
1997 1856 146.3 — — — — -5 +2 +142 57.7% +0.51 11–9 (55%) 11–5 (69%) 100.3 -0.20 1994 1773 143.7 — — — — +15 -260 -181 48.5% -0.08 9–6 (60%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.29
1998 1675 104.7 — — — — +65 +68 — 39.1% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +1.05 1995 1788 149.0 — — — — +45 -292 — 54.1% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +0.06
1999 1653 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18 1996 1666 124.9 — — — — +54 -192 — 31.6% -1.28 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.43
2006 1642 101.1 -1.73 -1.74 0.650 43.0% — — +401 36.4% -0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.10 1997 1674 119.1 — — — — +34 — — 52.6% +0.37 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.07
2007 1616 101.8 -1.59 -2.16 0.779 45.4% +51 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–2 — -0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
2008 1593 96.5 +1.39 -2.63 0.741 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 2026 147.5 -1.20 -2.11 0.735 44.6% -6 -3 +29 55.4% +0.29 100–69 (59%) 96–80 (55%) 105.7 +1.00 Career 1850 139.8 — — — — +22 -251 -124 47.3% -0.20 63–57 (53%) 39–25 (61%) 108.7 +0.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.