H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 2-1
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 2–1 lead over Marianne Werdel Witmeyer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1994 Roland Garros second round 6-4 7-6(9).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 6-4 7-6(9) | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | 6-3 4-6 6-4 | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | Match data |
| Apr 17, 1988* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-4 7-6 | Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | #919 | #9 | 1,672 | 2,025 | 295 | 220 | 57.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1986 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #149 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #83 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #43 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #30 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #33 | 1,818 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #40 | 1,789 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 37–15 | 71.2% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #12 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #15 | 1,855 | 0 | 7 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #188 | 1,673 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #893 | 1,651 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #299 | 1,642 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #190 | 1,614 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #391 | 1,592 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |