H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 2-5

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 5–2 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 3–1 on hard courts, while Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1996 Sydney quarterfinal 7-6 6-3.

NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 5
7 main draw meetings
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 13, 1996* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #13 7-6 6-3 Mary Joe Fernandez #10 Match data
Jun 24, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #12 6-4 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #26 Match data
Jun 1, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #7 2-6 7-5 6-3 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #28 Match data
Oct 15, 1992* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-2 3-6 6-3 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #29 Match data
Sep 6, 1992* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-4 6-2 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #30 Match data
Nov 14, 1991* Philadelphia WTA 250 R32 Carpet Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #35 6-1 2-6 6-4 Mary Joe Fernandez #7 Match data
Aug 29, 1991* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #6 7-6(4) 6-3 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #32 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1984 0–2 0.0% 1,475 0 0
13 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1986 0–1 0.0% 1,490 0 0 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7
35 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7