H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy vs Patty Fendick H2H: 2-4

Patty Fendick holds a 4–2 lead over Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Patty Fendick leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1995 Oklahoma semifinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Patty Fendick
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 18, 1995* Oklahoma WTA 250 SF Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #13 6-2 6-2 Patty Fendick #61 Match data
Nov 6, 1992* Oakland WTA 250 R16 Carpet Patty Fendick #49 6-4 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #31 Match data
Jun 17, 1992* Eastbourne WTA 250 R64 Grass Patty Fendick #75 4-6 7-6 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #27 Match data
Apr 12, 1991* Amelia Island WTA 250 R16 Clay Patty Fendick #72 6-3 6-4 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #87 Match data
Apr 23, 1988* Taipei WTA 250 SF Carpet Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #54 6-2 6-4 Patty Fendick #25 Match data
Jan 9, 1988* Sydney WTA 500 QF Grass Patty Fendick #49 6-3 7-5 Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #153 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,430 0 0
19 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,551 0 0
21 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,740 0 3
26 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,690 0 3
27 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,779 0 3
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,725 0 3
30 — — — — — — — 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,691 0 3
35 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7 — — — — — — —
36 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7 — — — — — — —
37 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7 — — — — — — —